For the time-challenged, I propose to highlight sections of Jim Puplava's Newshour. "Financial Sense" is what it says on the tin and I plan to make this a regular read/listen. Working off the transcript for July 7 (and that's another very laudable feature of his service), here is my interpretation of some points he makes about the subprime crisis:
The real sting of subprime defaults is in how they may affect the credit ratings of CDOs (Collateralised Debt Obligations, i.e. mortgages grouped together and sold on as interest-yielding investments). Some major institutional investors, including pension funds, have bought CDOs, but are required NOT to hold any bonds below "investment grade". So if these CDOs drop below a "BBB" rating, the fund managers will be forced to sell, and if there is a wholesale selloff there will be a sharp drop in the price.
Also, the hedge funds that invest in CDOs may have borrowed 10-20 times the value of their capital, to multiply their investments. The margin of safety is thin and a relatively small loss could trigger a cash call. So although Federal Reserve officials are correct in saying that subprime debt is only a small proportion of the lending market, this borrowing-to-invest vastly magnifies the problems.
Another complication is that credit ratings don't mean the same thing for all types of bond. Over the last decade or two, "BBB" rated corporate bonds have had a default rate of 2.2%, but BBB-rated CDOs have a 24% default rate. Do all investment managers fully realise this?
There is over $200 billion in subprime bonds that need to be re-rated, but rating firms are putting off the evil day. One reason for the delay is that the ratings people have a conflict of interest. It seems that many were involved in designing the CDOs in the first place, so if a re-rating happens soon, awkward questions will be asked and reputations shredded. There might even be litigation for damages. Meanwhile, Puplava speculates, the government itself might wish to encourage a more gradual unfolding of the bad news, to prevent the avalanche.
Saturday, July 14, 2007
More on real inflation figures via iTulip
Further to my post of 9 July re "real" inflation, I have received the following comment from the originator of the charts - thanks.
I am the author of the charts referenced above. For the latest, see here:
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/recDJIAtoRD.html
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/newestHousData.gif
FYI, thru today 7/12 for the Real Dow, and thru 2007 Q1 (= mid-Feb 2007) for Real Homes: Real Dow is 2.24x the +1.64 %/yr curve, which is a 55% drop thereto, and Real Homes national (green points) is 1.78x the ca. 54 level, which is a 44% drop thereto.
I am the author of the charts referenced above. For the latest, see here:
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/recDJIAtoRD.html
http://homepage.mac.com/ttsmyf/newestHousData.gif
FYI, thru today 7/12 for the Real Dow, and thru 2007 Q1 (= mid-Feb 2007) for Real Homes: Real Dow is 2.24x the +1.64 %/yr curve, which is a 55% drop thereto, and Real Homes national (green points) is 1.78x the ca. 54 level, which is a 44% drop thereto.
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Listen to Financial Sense!
Click here for the transcript of July 7's edition of Jim Puplava's Financial Sense Newshour. This is a wide-ranging overview, from subprime loans to commodity investing and listeners' queries.
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
Soothing noises from the US Treasury re subprime losses
Treasury officials are quoted in Bloomberg, saying that subprime losses don't represent a systemic threat. Another official, Frederic Mishkin, said something similar at the Levy Economics Institute symposium this month (see my blog of 5 July).
Cash still king?
British investment portfolio manager Tim Price gives his reasons for favouring cash in the present economic circumstances. The post is a few weeks old, but echoes similar intimations from Marc Faber. Price has also reviewed Michael Panzner favourably.
Peak oil, commodity prices, globalisation, back to the land
An interesting article from Tom Stevenson in Britain's Daily Telegraph, on oil. He reaches two conclusions:
1. it's good news for the commodity investor
2. when supply hits its limit, demand will have to change, and so will our lives
The second is far more interesting. I think we will eventually start listening to the dreamers who are even now formulating new currency systems for localised commerce. And we'll need to unwind our dependence on the car. Think of the implications.
1. it's good news for the commodity investor
2. when supply hits its limit, demand will have to change, and so will our lives
The second is far more interesting. I think we will eventually start listening to the dreamers who are even now formulating new currency systems for localised commerce. And we'll need to unwind our dependence on the car. Think of the implications.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
"Real" mortgage rates - a real estate expert writes
A real estate expert, Jonathan J Miller, comments and expands on Barron's recent article on "real" mortgage interest rates, and the state of the housing market generally. I have added Matrix to the bears' link list.
Housing to drag the Dow down?
iTulip is pessimistic about the effect of a housing downturn on the US stockmarket, and skeptical about reported GDP.
Presidency a cyclical influence on the market?
Contrary Investor's July report examines stockmarket cycles in relation to Presidential terms, and draws some tentative but suspicious conclusions.
Marc Faber: "Buy early, exit early"
Marc Faber gave us his approach in the Financial Express on Sunday, and his currently bearish outlook on most classes of asset. Like Sir John Templeton, he believes in buying when the pessimism is at its height. He's also quite dismissive of fund managers' performance.
Peter Schiff: will Japan pull the plug on America?
Peter Schiff, in The Market Oracle yesterday, reports that Japanese monetary inflation is about to show up in their consumer prices. They may be able to cover it by fudging the inflation index (some of us have seen that done elsewhere), but it can't fool everyone forever.
For a long time, Japan has increased its money supply and exported the excess cash by purchasing US Treasury bonds. This keeps the yen steady against the weak dollar, protecting Japan's exports; and it also keeps US interest rates low, so reducing the pressure to raise rates in Japan.
Schiff felicitously terms this a "vendor financing scheme", but regards America's economic collapse as "inevitable". He thinks hyperinflation is too high a price for Japan to pay, and if she retreats from the brink and alters her monetary policy, then the result will be inflation in the US, forcing higher interest rates, and collapsing stock and real property values.
This is what Schiff has predicted in his book, "Crash Proof" (see my review here) and it's interesting to note that the author has been appearing more frequently in the news lately. Either he thinks the turning point is close, or he's marketing the book more actively.
Schiff also comments on the fear of deflation, saying "falling consumer prices are one of the natural rewards that people enjoy in market economies", a point made in Richard Daughty's masterly performance on You Tube. It's so funny and succinct that I re-watch this myself from time to time - have another look:
UPDATE
For a counter-view (in the sense that he doesn't expect the crisis for some years yet), see Puru Saxena as I reported on July 28 here.
For a long time, Japan has increased its money supply and exported the excess cash by purchasing US Treasury bonds. This keeps the yen steady against the weak dollar, protecting Japan's exports; and it also keeps US interest rates low, so reducing the pressure to raise rates in Japan.
Schiff felicitously terms this a "vendor financing scheme", but regards America's economic collapse as "inevitable". He thinks hyperinflation is too high a price for Japan to pay, and if she retreats from the brink and alters her monetary policy, then the result will be inflation in the US, forcing higher interest rates, and collapsing stock and real property values.
This is what Schiff has predicted in his book, "Crash Proof" (see my review here) and it's interesting to note that the author has been appearing more frequently in the news lately. Either he thinks the turning point is close, or he's marketing the book more actively.
Schiff also comments on the fear of deflation, saying "falling consumer prices are one of the natural rewards that people enjoy in market economies", a point made in Richard Daughty's masterly performance on You Tube. It's so funny and succinct that I re-watch this myself from time to time - have another look:
UPDATE
For a counter-view (in the sense that he doesn't expect the crisis for some years yet), see Puru Saxena as I reported on July 28 here.
Americans should invest abroad - Wasik
Writing in Bloomberg yesterday, John Wasik considers how Americans should invest, since homes, equities and bonds all seem poor value. He recommends high-yielding foreign (i.e. non-US) equities, something Peter Schiff (Crash Proof) has been tipping for quite a while. This, he thinks, will provide yield but also hedge against further falls in the dollar's exchange rate.
Monday, July 09, 2007
Energy crunch = higher food costs
Continuing the theme of energy demands, the Contrarian Investors' Journal comments that the search for alternatives to oil is causing inflation in food prices.
Energy crunch?
Frederick Sheehan's article Reaping the Whirlwind, originally posted in Whiskey & Gunpowder, is reproduced today in Prudent Bear. The prose is rather poetic, but the issue is how an overheated world economy is straining the world's capacity to grow energy supplies to cope. Worse still, new housing designs in the US and upgraded housing in the developing world, are building-in permanent excessive energy demand.
Safe Haven suggests Dow 9,000 "in the intermediate term"
Chartist Robert McHugh at Safe Haven reads the runes and predicts a significant correction for the Dow - in real terms (i.e. as measured against gold), if not nominal terms.
How far to fall? iTulip on the Dow and house prices
iTulip shows charts that follow the Dow and house prices, comparing them with inflation over a long period. The implication of the way this information is presented, is that stocks are about 100% over trend, or to put it another way, have a 50% fall to get to the trend line, and house prices would have maybe a third to lose.
I would guess that in terms of crystallising loss, this is more significant for equities than for real property, because you have to live somewhere.
I would guess that in terms of crystallising loss, this is more significant for equities than for real property, because you have to live somewhere.
News hub for sub-prime mortgage issue
A contributor has kindly alerted me to a blog that explains the issues and collates news items - please click here. Sub-Prime Mess is now also on the link list (see sidebar).
Subprime mortgages: bad news and more to come
Following the collapse of Braddock Financial's $300 million Galena Street, Reuters (6 July) looks ahead to what other hedge funds will have to report.
The Mogambo Guru includes subprime loans in his latest Daily Reckoning rave. I do hope someone posts his Agora Financial conference speech onto YouTube.
The Mogambo Guru includes subprime loans in his latest Daily Reckoning rave. I do hope someone posts his Agora Financial conference speech onto YouTube.
Sunday, July 08, 2007
Marc Faber bullish on Indian real estate
See here for Moneycontrol.com's interview with Marc Faber, where he expresses enthusiasm for Indian realty:
...I think that is a no-brainer in the long run. It is a problem for people who will have very high borrowings, against their realty because of interest rates. Realty has always been a cyclical industry, where prices move up or down. But by and large if I look at the world, the reason so many families are rich, that came out of realty, is that the money was tied up in realty. They did not do anything more stupid with their money like buying Internet stocks in 2000 and then losing 90% of their money as prices went down.
So, my advice essentially for people, if you are not an expert in financial matters, to own realty - a safer avenue to wealth.
Faber also predicts a near-future stockmarket correction in the US of more than 10%, and in the longer term:
I expect over the next 20 years interest rates in the US will go much higher than it is perceived by the market place as I think inflation in the US will accelerate on the upside partly because of the rise in the prices of commodity, energy and food. This is also partly because of the weakness in the dollar that will eventually lift import prices.
...I think that is a no-brainer in the long run. It is a problem for people who will have very high borrowings, against their realty because of interest rates. Realty has always been a cyclical industry, where prices move up or down. But by and large if I look at the world, the reason so many families are rich, that came out of realty, is that the money was tied up in realty. They did not do anything more stupid with their money like buying Internet stocks in 2000 and then losing 90% of their money as prices went down.
So, my advice essentially for people, if you are not an expert in financial matters, to own realty - a safer avenue to wealth.
Faber also predicts a near-future stockmarket correction in the US of more than 10%, and in the longer term:
I expect over the next 20 years interest rates in the US will go much higher than it is perceived by the market place as I think inflation in the US will accelerate on the upside partly because of the rise in the prices of commodity, energy and food. This is also partly because of the weakness in the dollar that will eventually lift import prices.
Calls for a fully-funded Social Security pension
Free Market News Network (July 2) interviewed Peter Schiff, who said that the current rob-Peter-to-pay-Paul pension system will unravel in a few years, because of demographics. Newt Gingrich (former Speaker of the House) thinks a funded pension system should be introduced, but control of the funds should be out of the hands of the government.
This is very similar to proposals put forward in the UK by the Pensions Reform Group, chaired by former minister for welfare reform, Frank Field MP. The working name for it is a "Universal Protected Pension". The proposals betray the same worry as Gingrich implies, which is that the government may find a way to steal all or part of the fund.
This is very similar to proposals put forward in the UK by the Pensions Reform Group, chaired by former minister for welfare reform, Frank Field MP. The working name for it is a "Universal Protected Pension". The proposals betray the same worry as Gingrich implies, which is that the government may find a way to steal all or part of the fund.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)