There's been much talk of keeping the balance in your bank account/s below the insured limit - but if you are cautious and want to preserve the value of what's in your pension pot, how can you do it?
"Mish" reports a massive write-off by a money market fund manager, following losses with Lehman.
UPDATE:
If you have funds in a money market and it is not backed by only Treasury debt, you need to consider moving that money right here, right now. - Karl Denninger
Showing posts with label pensions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pensions. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Friday, November 09, 2007
Devil take the hindmost
The Mogambo Guru vents his muscular spleen on inflation-capping for pensions in Britain. Quite right. The old are spending the kids' inheritance royally. There's so much talk of the selfishness of the young, but the oldies really knock the lights out in that competition.
Saturday, November 03, 2007
Secondary explosion
Ty Andros (Financial Sense, Friday) repeats the point made by Jim Puplava (which we reported earlier this summer), that the credit agencies' re-rating of subprime packages have ignited an explosion inside the banking system, but this may only be the detonator that sets off the main charge:
Whereas the big banks and investment houses can hide behind tier three and pray for a market recovery, the investing community cannot. Pension funds, institutions and money market funds, have fiduciary investment covenants which direct them to sell securities which are below certain ratings levels. Once an investment falls into the lower rungs on the investment scales they are bound by their own investing rules to divest the assets.
Tens of billions of dollars of securities have been downgraded since the beginning of October and this will require that they be sold in a timely manner. Once those securities hit the markets we will know their true value, and it won’t be pretty. The super SIV will quickly become an exercise in wishful thinking as their “high quality” paper becomes junk in the maelstrom of liquidation which increases every time a security is downgraded. The super SIV’s whole reason for being was to prevent fire sales and price discovery.
Whereas the big banks and investment houses can hide behind tier three and pray for a market recovery, the investing community cannot. Pension funds, institutions and money market funds, have fiduciary investment covenants which direct them to sell securities which are below certain ratings levels. Once an investment falls into the lower rungs on the investment scales they are bound by their own investing rules to divest the assets.
Tens of billions of dollars of securities have been downgraded since the beginning of October and this will require that they be sold in a timely manner. Once those securities hit the markets we will know their true value, and it won’t be pretty. The super SIV will quickly become an exercise in wishful thinking as their “high quality” paper becomes junk in the maelstrom of liquidation which increases every time a security is downgraded. The super SIV’s whole reason for being was to prevent fire sales and price discovery.
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Don't get mad
Adrian Ash in the Daily Reckoning Australia today, passes on some facts about the drop in US mortgage underwriting standards:
...mortgage underwriting changed beyond recognition between 1998 and 2006, as First American Financial recently reported:
* Adjustable rate mortgages as a percentage of new mortgages rose from 0.7% to 69.5%;
* Negative Amortisation loans - where the principal owed actually increases over time - rose from 0% to 42.2% of the market;
* Interest Only home loans - where the borrower only has to cover the interest due, leaving the principal for repayment sometime in the far future - rose from 0.1% to 35.6%;
* Silent Seconds, issued on the back of outstanding loans to the most vaguely-related people, rose from 0.1% to 38.7%;
* Low Documentation - where the greater the lie, the greater the loan - rose from 57% to 79.8%.
In short, the US mortgage market switched from cautious Fixed-Rate borrowing to head-in-the-sand ARMs...while the underlying debt was left untouched or actually grew larger...as borrowers struggled to meet just the interest alone after fudging the numbers to bag a loan they could never repay.
Most shocking of all, as Robert Rodriguez of First Pacific Advisors has noted, "is that the origination volumes for the last two years, when the most egregious deterioration in underwriting standards occurred, total more than the previous seven years of originations combined."
And this poor-quality debt has been sold to pension funds, very carefully staying just under a crucial limit:
"24% of all the hyper-leveraged assets managed by large hedge funds (US$1 billion or more) internationally, belong to pension funds and endowments," says a June 18 report from Greenwich Associates, as quoted by Paul Gallagher in the Executive Intelligence Review. "This average is just below the 25% limit at which an individual hedge fund, under the [US] Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) as modified in 2006, becomes an investment advisor with fiduciary responsibility for the pension fund doing the investing - something hedge funds obviously do not want to do."
More than that, pension funds have also stumped up one-fifth of the money held in 'hedge funds of funds', the aggregating super-funds run by many large banks. In first-half 2007, around 40% of current flows into the hedge fund industry has come from pension funds. And "as pension fund money is coming in," says Gallagher, "it's allowing 'smart' money to get out."
...Numerous reports, including a new one from Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research, Inc., have shown 'high net-worth individuals' reducing their net hedge fund investments by half, between 2006 and 2007 - investing instead into real property and stocks. They now account for only about 20% of the assets of hedge funds, which were supposedly made for them."
Instead of high-net-worth billionaires, it's now Joe Public left holding this junk, thanks of course to his well-paid retirement fund managers...
Giving control of your money to a financial "expert" might indeed prove the most foolish decision of all.
To me, this is outrageous. I've written earlier about a brokers' meeting I attended in 1999, where a rep from a technology fund burbled enthusiastically about the "super-boom" to come, and how I felt that the smart money was looking to use us to sell their holdings to suckers. And I think the same happened with the Lloyds of London scandal - advisers were encouraged to help their clients get a seat on what they thought was the gravy train, when the insiders knew it was the vinegar bottle. Now it seems we've seen effectively a raid on pension funds.
I sometimes suspect that the money system is not for storing wealth, but for stealing it.
The authorities should be busting the offenders, not bailing them. We should pay off depositors so they can put their savings elsewhere, re-educate naive financial advisers and institutional fund managers, and bankrupt the swindlers.
Here in England, London's Central Criminal Court has a motto above the entrance:
"Defend the Children of the Poor & Punish the Wrongdoer"
If I were an American, I'd be asking questions about justice and the rule of law: does the nation still protect the weak against the strong? Meanwhile, now that you know how the game is played, find a way to win honourably.
...mortgage underwriting changed beyond recognition between 1998 and 2006, as First American Financial recently reported:
* Adjustable rate mortgages as a percentage of new mortgages rose from 0.7% to 69.5%;
* Negative Amortisation loans - where the principal owed actually increases over time - rose from 0% to 42.2% of the market;
* Interest Only home loans - where the borrower only has to cover the interest due, leaving the principal for repayment sometime in the far future - rose from 0.1% to 35.6%;
* Silent Seconds, issued on the back of outstanding loans to the most vaguely-related people, rose from 0.1% to 38.7%;
* Low Documentation - where the greater the lie, the greater the loan - rose from 57% to 79.8%.
In short, the US mortgage market switched from cautious Fixed-Rate borrowing to head-in-the-sand ARMs...while the underlying debt was left untouched or actually grew larger...as borrowers struggled to meet just the interest alone after fudging the numbers to bag a loan they could never repay.
Most shocking of all, as Robert Rodriguez of First Pacific Advisors has noted, "is that the origination volumes for the last two years, when the most egregious deterioration in underwriting standards occurred, total more than the previous seven years of originations combined."
And this poor-quality debt has been sold to pension funds, very carefully staying just under a crucial limit:
"24% of all the hyper-leveraged assets managed by large hedge funds (US$1 billion or more) internationally, belong to pension funds and endowments," says a June 18 report from Greenwich Associates, as quoted by Paul Gallagher in the Executive Intelligence Review. "This average is just below the 25% limit at which an individual hedge fund, under the [US] Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) as modified in 2006, becomes an investment advisor with fiduciary responsibility for the pension fund doing the investing - something hedge funds obviously do not want to do."
More than that, pension funds have also stumped up one-fifth of the money held in 'hedge funds of funds', the aggregating super-funds run by many large banks. In first-half 2007, around 40% of current flows into the hedge fund industry has come from pension funds. And "as pension fund money is coming in," says Gallagher, "it's allowing 'smart' money to get out."
...Numerous reports, including a new one from Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research, Inc., have shown 'high net-worth individuals' reducing their net hedge fund investments by half, between 2006 and 2007 - investing instead into real property and stocks. They now account for only about 20% of the assets of hedge funds, which were supposedly made for them."
Instead of high-net-worth billionaires, it's now Joe Public left holding this junk, thanks of course to his well-paid retirement fund managers...
Giving control of your money to a financial "expert" might indeed prove the most foolish decision of all.
To me, this is outrageous. I've written earlier about a brokers' meeting I attended in 1999, where a rep from a technology fund burbled enthusiastically about the "super-boom" to come, and how I felt that the smart money was looking to use us to sell their holdings to suckers. And I think the same happened with the Lloyds of London scandal - advisers were encouraged to help their clients get a seat on what they thought was the gravy train, when the insiders knew it was the vinegar bottle. Now it seems we've seen effectively a raid on pension funds.
I sometimes suspect that the money system is not for storing wealth, but for stealing it.
The authorities should be busting the offenders, not bailing them. We should pay off depositors so they can put their savings elsewhere, re-educate naive financial advisers and institutional fund managers, and bankrupt the swindlers.
Here in England, London's Central Criminal Court has a motto above the entrance:
"Defend the Children of the Poor & Punish the Wrongdoer"
If I were an American, I'd be asking questions about justice and the rule of law: does the nation still protect the weak against the strong? Meanwhile, now that you know how the game is played, find a way to win honourably.
.................... A South Sea Bubble playing card
Sunday, July 08, 2007
Calls for a fully-funded Social Security pension
Free Market News Network (July 2) interviewed Peter Schiff, who said that the current rob-Peter-to-pay-Paul pension system will unravel in a few years, because of demographics. Newt Gingrich (former Speaker of the House) thinks a funded pension system should be introduced, but control of the funds should be out of the hands of the government.
This is very similar to proposals put forward in the UK by the Pensions Reform Group, chaired by former minister for welfare reform, Frank Field MP. The working name for it is a "Universal Protected Pension". The proposals betray the same worry as Gingrich implies, which is that the government may find a way to steal all or part of the fund.
This is very similar to proposals put forward in the UK by the Pensions Reform Group, chaired by former minister for welfare reform, Frank Field MP. The working name for it is a "Universal Protected Pension". The proposals betray the same worry as Gingrich implies, which is that the government may find a way to steal all or part of the fund.
Sunday, July 01, 2007
Subprime lending in the US housing market rocking the boat
The Bloomberg financial site is following the subprime mortgage story, and quotes Peter Schiff (see my review of his book) as predicting that the majority of such loans will default.
In the US as in the UK, inflation has made house prices rise fast, and in turn this has encouraged lenders to offer mortgages almost recklessly: high loan to valuation (sometimes even more than 100%), borrowers with a less than perfect track record of honouring their commitments.
Also, and unlike in the UK, the US mortgage has traditionally been a long-term, fixed rate deal, but more recently, many homeowners have taken out loans with a short-term, very low initial interest rate, and now they are coming out of the initial period into higher, variable rates. This would be a challenge anyway, but the variable rates are rising as the government seeks to rein in inflation.
You would expect that the lenders have most to worry about, but there has been a trend towards putting blocks of these debts together and selling them on to third parties as income-yielding investments. Since this gets risky debt off the lenders' hands, the lenders don't mind doing more of the same, so there is a temptation to become careless about quality.
But that risk has been transferred to the investment market, so a wave of defaults will hit returns on investments. And the investor isn't always quite aware of the degree of risk involved. The worst-risk packages are known as "equity tranches" and some have been sold to pension funds - see Michael Panzner's submission to Seeking Alpha. Some would see this hawking of bad risk as looking for suckers, and even with knowledge of his fiduciary obligation, the buyer may sometimes be a bit more gullible if it's not his own money he's investing.
In the US as in the UK, inflation has made house prices rise fast, and in turn this has encouraged lenders to offer mortgages almost recklessly: high loan to valuation (sometimes even more than 100%), borrowers with a less than perfect track record of honouring their commitments.
Also, and unlike in the UK, the US mortgage has traditionally been a long-term, fixed rate deal, but more recently, many homeowners have taken out loans with a short-term, very low initial interest rate, and now they are coming out of the initial period into higher, variable rates. This would be a challenge anyway, but the variable rates are rising as the government seeks to rein in inflation.
You would expect that the lenders have most to worry about, but there has been a trend towards putting blocks of these debts together and selling them on to third parties as income-yielding investments. Since this gets risky debt off the lenders' hands, the lenders don't mind doing more of the same, so there is a temptation to become careless about quality.
But that risk has been transferred to the investment market, so a wave of defaults will hit returns on investments. And the investor isn't always quite aware of the degree of risk involved. The worst-risk packages are known as "equity tranches" and some have been sold to pension funds - see Michael Panzner's submission to Seeking Alpha. Some would see this hawking of bad risk as looking for suckers, and even with knowledge of his fiduciary obligation, the buyer may sometimes be a bit more gullible if it's not his own money he's investing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)