Wednesday, April 22, 2026

The State of Us, by Wiggia

To start, a classic example of one of the reasons the West is in terminal decline; when government appointees can waste time on utter crap like this we know we are in the death throes of western civilisation:

Nothing should surprise us any more. After all, they declare that a 5-year-old is apparently old enough to decide they’re the opposite gender but a 15-year-old is too young to use social media. The people in charge of this country have completely lost their minds.

The rise of the Greens is no surprise either. With all the parties failing to grasp what is fundamentally wrong in the country, with the possible exception of Rupert Lowe who currently can only loudly point out the obvious, the Greens have taken the space to supply a safe haven for all those virtual signallers that ‘care’ about things. The fact that the party has been taken over by complete lunatics somehow escapes scrutiny.

NHRN

We currently have a government and indeed the majority of the HoC filled with people of a standard that is so far below that which is needed in these troubled times, that I can’t see any future for the country unless a Churchillian figure emerges from nowhere and saves us. There is no one or no party that has any power that inspires anyone at the moment. A nation that along with Allies saved Europe during WW11 is rapidly becoming a backwater. We are not alone, Europe is in the same boat but I don’t really care about that in these times. Never have I heard so many people with negative doubts about the present and the future and the feelings of being betrayed at every turn by the powers that be.

With people like this, and she is not alone by any means, representing the public, what chance of any advancement do we have?

For months now the “Liebore” lot have been boasting about falling NHS England waiting lists. Apparently, the number on the waiting list fell by 80,000 in November, the last month the numbers were published. But how was that achieved when the same figures show a drop of 10% in operations and people seen in appointments?

And now this……

I personally on another visit to the local hospital came across yet more nonsense in the way the trust is run. Two visits actually. The first required an ambulance; four hours after the initial call it arrived despite urgent calls in the meantime. On arrival at A&E a further four hours were spent in the car park awaiting a vacant bed in the emergency ward.

A chat with the ambulance crew revealed all : they are being used as an overflow ward in the car park. This means their main purpose, to get to people and take them to hospital is now a secondary requirement. They are well aware of this but cannot speak out for fear of losing their jobs! So they request that patients complain!

This system means that crews are stuck in the car park for hours and not out doing what we consider ambulance crews should do. It not only endanger lives but is a waste of manpower and dangerous to waiting patients. Who thinks these decisions are good practice?

A second item came to notice on my second visit, something that had caught my eye several times before but was not a priority at the time. This occasion resulted in a move to a ward in the evening. It is obvious that hospitals have become 9-5 operations and Monday – Friday, matching GP surgeries: it’s not a good idea to become unwell on a weekend in this country.

The change of ward meant a long journey through the corridors and up two floors. It became very obvious that the general silence was not because of a desire for quiet at night but because there was nothing happening. Why? A large number of wards were closed, no lights, no activity at all. This did not make sense when the same hospital has patients in corridors, so why?

It appears that when the Norfolk &Norwich hospital was built about fifteen years ago, replacing the old hospital in the city centre, it was as is usual in this country massively over budget. The trust could not afford the many alterations and improvements that were added to the original plan and Serco actually purchased the hospital and leased it back to the NHS trust.

Serco of course also provide all the services, so though the hospital operates under the NHS flag it does not actually own it.

Quite extraordinary that this situation exists, and naturally further extensions and improvements are announced but seemingly never finished within the time frame stipulated or the original budget. As they are PFI projects we should not be surprised that contractual ‘issues’ pushed the price up.

Still as with most things it is good to see that the NHS has got its priorities right…….

Doctors told to avoid phrases such as ‘raining cats and dogs’ and ‘the early bird catches the worm’ to avoid offending foreign patients

It is amazing that when anything is built in the public sector the cost and time frame for completion go out of the window. None of these problems ever arise if a new superstore is built and penalty clauses are part of the deal; perhaps, in fact I am sure, we would be better off if Tesco were put in charge of these projects.

Now it would be easy to state this is a one off, but apparently not as regards closed areas. My sister for instance attends two different west London hospitals and one of them has closed areas. How many others are there ?

I also had a long chat with a newly qualified nurse who was giving me details about those who qualify not being able to get jobs in the NHS as they prefer the cheaper labour they import. This gives rise to the false belief the NHS would collapse if they banned all immigrant staff; it wouldn’t as there is a large pool of qualified Brits waiting for the jobs, so another lie.

Mr Streeting of course like all before him is all mouth and trousers. So called improvements in waiting lists have been proved to be simple juggling acts with the figures and methods of calculation. His pledge of no more money without changes have been shown to be just words.

The NHS is at the point of being not fit for purpose in many departments. We all pay for this sub standard service and it is not lack of money or personnel, far from it with the latter, but unless someone gets a grip on it and makes real change and not cosmetic, we are in trouble. The NHS is now at the bottom in many areas of care compared with equivalent health care systems. The scare mongering that we will follow the American system is just that, scaremongering. It is all the other systems that are superior that should be studied and if an insurance model is proved to be better so be it.

Otherwise the decline will continue and we will resemble, as my earlier piece described in the local A&E for example, a scene from a third world country. The acceptance of corridor care in the NHS as the norm shows the way.

As light relief from all this we face a week of “he said, you said” in Parliament and everywhere else over the PM’s disastrous choice of Mandelson as UK Ambassador. He (Starmer) really is clueless but we will have probably to suffer more of him as the alternatives are worse. The state of us!

It’s good to know that our PM is on the ball, see this on the day the straits of Hormuz reopened, and he went to Paris to announce his ‘plan’, God help us:

I’ve just discovered through FOIs that Bracknell Forest Council has spent over £74,000 on translation services for Afghan arrivals since April.

Why is that level of translation needed when residents were told they had served our armed forces as translators?

I’ve also been asking the council, MoD and Home Office for months now how many actually served our armed forces, but they’ve refused to release the information.

What is going on here?

Why are translation services needed for translators?
How many of the Afghan arrivals actually served our armed forces?
And if not many, why was it implied most had?

Because right now it’s starting to look like the public’s admiration for our armed forces was played on to stop debate and push this policy through.

Bond markets react:

The highest they were during the Truss government was:
10-year - 4.3% (today 4.78%)
30-year - - 4.8% (today 5.49%)

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Starmer, national sovereignty and the Ministerial Code

Since the Mandelson/Starmer matter questions are being asked about whether the Ministerial Code has been breached.

This prompted me to look at how the current PM changed the Code when he came to power, and one item jumps out. It relates to the extent to which international law and treaties may override our national sovereignty.

Paragraph 1.6 of the 2010 edition issued under the then new Con-LibDem coalition government read thus:

“The Ministerial Code should be read against the background of the overarching duty on ministers to comply with the law including international law and treaty obligations and to uphold the administration of justice and to protect the integrity of public life.”

In October 2015, following the General Election which returned a Conservative government under Cameron, the italicised words were omitted. Officially it was said not to be a substantive legal change but in that case why the change in wording?

In a letter to The Guardian newspaper the Treasury Solicitor Paul Jenkins said:

“As the government’s most senior legal official I saw at close hand from 2010 onwards the intense irritation these words caused the PM as he sought to avoid complying with our international legal obligations, for example in relation to prisoner voting.

“Whether the new wording alters the legal obligations of ministers or not, there can be no doubt that they will regard the change as bolstering, in a most satisfying way, their contempt for the rule of international law.”

According to Grok critics

“argued it was motivated by frustration within parts of the Conservative government — particularly Cameron himself — with certain international obligations, especially:

“The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and rulings from the European Court of Human Rights (e.g., on prisoner voting, deportation cases, or counter-terrorism).

“Broader tensions with international law in areas like military action, immigration, or treaty commitments.”

In November 2024 under the new PM Sir Keir Starmer the relevant paragraph was amended to read:

“The Ministerial Code should be read against the background of the overarching duty on ministers to comply with the law, including international law and treaty obligations, and to protect the integrity of public life.”

It remains the same in the 2025 edition.

It seems clear that Starmer wishes to see our sovereignty re-subordinated to supranational governance.

This is evidenced in the proposed new law to bring our legislation into “dynamic alignment” with EU law and implement it via “Henry VIII” powers so as to bypass Parliamentary scrutiny.

Sir Keir is the deliberate enemy of our liberty and independence.

Monday, April 20, 2026

How Poland saved us from Communism

The video below tells us something I hadn’t known and should have. In the summer of 1920 Lenin sent 200,000 soldiers into Poland with the objective of reaching Berlin - and spreading Communism beyond.

Help from the West was not whole-hearted.

Postwar Germany was very weak at this time. Only a year earlier thousands of its people had starved to death as the Royal Navy continued its blockade during the 1919 peace negotiations. The Left was stirring: Communist revolts were put down by the Weimar government but who knows where a successful Red invasion could have led?

In Britain also there was much socialist unrest. Urged by the British Communist leader Harry Pollitt, organiser of the Hands Off Russia campaign, dock workers in London prevented the loading of arms onto the SS Jolly George for Poland.

Russia also had its sympathisers in France - only a few months later the French Section of the Workers’ International voted to join Lenin’s Comintern. For political and other reasons the help France provided to Poland, though crucial as it turned out, was limited.

Lenin’s attempt failed because intelligence reached the Polish military that the enemy’s forces, split into two, had a weakly defended centre through which the Poles managed to drive and harry the supply lines in the rear.

Here’s to Poland and the 1920 Battle of Warsaw.

Friday, April 17, 2026

FRIDAY MUSIC: Supertramp, by JD

Supertramp emerged from the unlikely partnership of two contrasting musical minds: Rick Davies, a working-class pianist with jazz and blues roots, and Roger Hodgson, a classically-trained vocalist with an angelic tenor.

From their chaotic beginnings as “Daddy” in 1969 to becoming one of the most successful rock groups of their era, Supertramp crafted intelligent yet accessible songs that balanced Davies’s urban grit with Hodgson’s ethereal idealism.

In 1979, Paul McCartney was asked to name his favourite song of the year. He chose The Logical Song by Supertramp. For Roger Hodgson, Supertramp’s co-leader, it was the greatest of compliments. “Having been brought up on The Beatles,” he said, “it was wonderful to hear that Paul McCartney loved my song.”

Hodgson left the group in 1983 to purse a solo career. Davies died in 2025 at the age of 81.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supertramp
https://supertramp.com/home

Supertramp - The Logical Song (Official Video)

Supertramp Don’t Leave Me Now

Supertramp - My Kind Of Lady

Rosie Had Everything Planned - Supertramp (1971) Songwriters: Frank A. Farrell / Roger Hodgson

Babaji - Supertramp co-founder Roger Hodgson, Writer and Composer

Supertramp - It’s Raining Again

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Cromwell returns: PMQs 15th April 2026

Sir Keir claims the right to govern based on a freak electoral result but since then has repeatedly shown his contempt for democratic accountability, not least at PMQs. This week after another Starmer peroration on Tory past history Speaker Hoyle was driven to tell him “Prime Minister, it is Prime Minister’s questions. We have got to concentrate.”

Some may think that Sir Lindsay’s intervention was partly a response to recent public comment on his own seeming reluctance to hold the PM’s feet to the fire but even so the latter had angry words for Hoyle, stomping off and furiously clouting the Speaker’s chair on his way out.

I suspect that Starmer’s question-dodging and tetchiness are because like other fanatics he has delegated his identity to an ideology, in this case a simplistic political one. To question his belief, his mission, is to threaten his sense of himself and it triggers aggression.

Leaders who are sure they are right are a danger to others. “I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken,” wrote Oliver Cromwell to the Church of Scotland just before slaughtering hundreds in the Battle of Dunbar.

Cromwell himself had no doubt that he was God’s instrument. So having fought the King as a Parliamentarian he ended by turning on Parliament, becoming as great a tyrant as Charles I had ever been. He dismissed the House of Commons, made himself Lord Protector and for a time split Britain into ten regions, each governed by an appointed Major-General.

This suppression of the people’s national voice is echoed in Sir Keir’s strategy. He is proposing to use “Henry VIII powers” in a new UK-EU trade bill to enable “dynamic alignment” with European regulations, so bypassing the Commons as was the practice when we were in the EU.

Just as power is deliberately leached away from Westminster, so also is it being sucked from the people all around England. Each of the several planned “unitary councils” is intended to rule a population of about 500,000 - seven times the size of an average Parliamentary constituency! The 2024 White Paper calls it “devolution” but as far as the individual voter is concerned it looks more like a system of Ottoman governors.

What will be the chances of “throwing the rascals out”? Come Christmas 2017 the current Mayor of London will have held office longer than Margaret Thatcher’s record tenure as Prime Minister, yet he was last elected on a turnout of only 40.5% in 2024. We think we are a democracy but our universal adult franchise is less than a century old and the habit can easily wither away. We are subjects not citizens.

As to justice, Magna Carta (1215) was originally not for our sakes but for King John’s barons: serfs and commoners were not “free men” entitled to trial by jury! That extended interpretation came much later, under Edward III.

Like Cromwell, socialists are sure they know what is right. They are the modern version of “the godly” but they serve History instead of God. As with religious fanatics, for them all opposition comes of the Devil and there is no debating with him. If for example, someone dares to raise the issue of organised mass violation of women and girls, that must be dismissed as a “dog-whistle” to the supporters of evil. And if the Speaker of the House of Commons offers even a mild criticism to the righteous he must be attacked; there is no compromise to be had between Right and Wrong.

On the contrary: our liberty, peace and prosperity depend on not resolving many issues and agreeing to disagree. Starmer and his lethal absolutist certainty are a grave danger to the common weal. He has described himself as a “hard bastard” and our hope lies in his being only half right; else we should be headed for another civil war.

Friday, April 10, 2026

FRIDAY MUSIC: Tango - Astor Piazzolla, by JD

Yes, it is time for tango once more and a suitable diversion from the madness of the world’s political lunatics/’leaders’:

We have had one or two tango posts previously as well as more than a few about other music and dance. This post is a variation on a theme: Astor Piazzolla is a well known name in the world of tango both as a composer and performer but the following videos feature his music in an orchestral setting. Sacrilege you may think and a long way from its roots but it works!

Gidon Kremer - Oblivion (Astor Piazzolla)

A. Piazzolla. Libertango

Astor Piazzolla “La Muerte Del Angel” Milano Chamber Orchestra

Astor Piazzolla - Oblivion

Piazzolla - Fuga y Misterio

Tuesday, April 07, 2026

It will all be fixed, eventually...

The first part of the tweet below shows the way forward:

People are rightly getting tired of the doom-mongers. If the gloomy prophets are right then what is the point of continuing to follow them? Those of working age who can make a new life abroad should do so - there are signs that this is happening already. The rest of us should hoard provisions and prepare defences.

Given the people who are now running the country and those who want to replace them it does seem that things are going to get worse before they get better. However, our gibbering in fear and anger merely generates income for the clickbaiters.

Instead we need to look past the crises to how the problems will be solved, for they will be, one way or another.

The hard way is simply for disaster to overtake us and for the survivors to rebuild.

If we want to avoid that we should continue to take an interest in national politics so that the destruction is less and the turnaround can start earlier.

To give us hope here are a couple of examples of how even a terrible situation can be rectified with intelligent analysis and systematic effort.

The first - and it’s worth watching - is about a farmer in Iowa who bought an additional forty acres of apparently dead ground. His neighbours loaded up with debt to buy more good land and new machines and were caught out when the President blocked grain exports to Russia and the Treasury boosted interest rates from nine to eighteen per cent. Our hero avoided the dangers of financialisation and spent several years improving the soil before growing a commercial crop. His business survived when thousands around him quit or were bankupted:

The second is about a 250-year plan to restore the great Caledonian forest from its tiny remnants - not just the trees but the whole ecosystem, from micoorganisms in the soil to wild animals and birds attracted back to the resources of the woods:

Like the farmer in the first video we need to start by working out what needs fixing and in what order. Here’s a bit of a list:

  • Securing cheap, reliable and plentiful energy

  • Balancing our national budget by rebuilding our industrial base and reforming the welfare state

  • Increasing our ability to grow food locally

  • Strengthening our national defences against foreign enemies

  • Dealing with threats from internal enemies - terrorists and revolutionaries

  • Suppressing crime and public disorder

  • Preserving our freedoms and our ability to influence those who govern us

The energy question is fundamental and highlights the difficulty we have with governance. Any fool can see that we need extra fossil fuels to cover our transition to sustainable EROI-positive energy security (nuclear, hydro etc), yet the fool in charge cannot see it!

As to farming, the Government should abandon trying to destroy it with taxation and instead punt in money to make it more productive.

As an example of what can be done consider the work of the inventor James Dyson who has developed a farming system that grows strawberries all year round, generates heat from waste and avoids the use of poisonous agricultural chemicals: https://www.dyson.co.uk/discover/sustainability/farming/dyson-farming-on-bbc-rick-stein-food-stories

To conclude, time will resolve all our problems, brutally if we are stupid.

And there is so much time ahead! Perhaps five billion more years before the Sun consumes the last of its hydrogen fuel, though long before that it is expected to continue steadily burning hotter to the point where Earth cannot support life. Elon Musk’s plan to colonise Mars may keep us going.

As to sustainable energy the former American Archdruid imagines that in the fullness of time we shall have another carboniferous age to make new oil and gas - though we likely shall not be around to benefit from it: https://www.resilience.org/stories/2013-09-05/the-next-ten-billion-years/

It’s all a question of temporal perspective.