Marc Faber update

.............................................. Real growth: farmland

A most interesting and informative interview with Marc Faber on Bloomberg TV, last Friday. He thinks we've seen, not a correction, but the start of a bear market. In his opinion, the central banks intervention is inappropriate and will cause inflation. He thinks they "should let the crisis burn through the system, and eliminate some players". The Dow should correct by 20 - 30%; and as hedge funds "de-leverage", i.e. reduce their borrowings, the prices of most assets will drop.

In answer to the defence that p/e ratios are still good (i.e. the share price divided by the dividends, one way to test whether shares are over-valued), he says that at the peak of a market, there is a bubble. In 1999 it was a share price bubble, but now there is a bubble in earnings, and we will see "earnings disappointments" in the near future. So the p/e ratio is misleading and shares are not reasonably valued.

He points out that around the time of Dow peaks in July and August, we were also seeing several hundred shares hitting yearly lows, so underneath the surface a recession has already begun. The Dow has held up because of certain areas, such as oil stocks; but in present conditions, he thinks it will be "very difficult for the market to make new highs". Faber says that realism will return when we see a fall in popular stocks such as Research In Motion, Apple and Google.

The fundamentals of emerging markets are sound, and he foresees their economies de-coupling from the fortunes of the USA; but currently their stockmarkets are also over-valued and may correct when deleveraging causes money to flow back out of them.

As to the dollar, he thinks that if the Fed resists the temptation to cut interest rates, the dollar could strengthen against emerging market currencies. Against the Euro and the yen, he's not so sure. "I think against gold, all currencies will depreciate over time".

In relation to property, he says depressed areas like Detroit probably can't fall much further, unlike Miami and Southern California. Asian property looks promising - he mentions cities like Manila, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. And relative to financial assets, farmland is depressed.

Accused of bearishness, Faber counters that to be bearish about assets is to be bullish about cash, which he has made plain for several months now. He even thinks that US Treasury notes and good-quality commercial bonds are a good investment.

I'm amazed how much valuable information this generous man gives away for nothing.

..................................................... Modern Manila

Which one's rich?

....................... Who's flying high now?

Let's see how we're doing.

America's reserve assets at April 2007 were $66.72 billion, of which about $11 bn in gold and $42 bn in foreign currency. The USA's estimated population is 301,139,947. So reserve assets per capita are $221.55.

China's foreign reserves minus gold were $1,202 billion in March. The World Gold Council says China has 600 tonnes of gold, and at today's price of $21,471.23 per kilo that's worth another $12.88 billion, making a total of $1,214.88 bn. China's population is estimated at 1,321,851,888. So China's reserves per capita are $919.07.

Using income statistics I quoted on August 9, an American's share of his/her country's reserve assets is worth 0.5% of per capita GDP; the equivalent value for a Chinese is 45.95% of nominal per capita GDP. But a dollar buys more in China: adjusted for purchasing power (PPP), Chinese reserve assets are worth around $5,254 per head.

So comparing national reserves only, China is 18.2 times richer than America in absolute terms, 4.15 times richer per capita in nominal terms, and 23.72 times richer per capita in terms of purchasing power

They worked for it. But, now what?

UPDATE

Here's a note to the US reserves statement that confuses me:

Treasury values its gold stock at $42.2222 per fine troy ounce and pursuant to 31 United States Code 5117 (b) issues gold certificates to the Federal Reserve at the same rate against all gold held.

Can I buy some at this price, please?

Don't get mad

Adrian Ash in the Daily Reckoning Australia today, passes on some facts about the drop in US mortgage underwriting standards:

...mortgage underwriting changed beyond recognition between 1998 and 2006, as First American Financial recently reported:

* Adjustable rate mortgages as a percentage of new mortgages rose from 0.7% to 69.5%;
* Negative Amortisation loans - where the principal owed actually increases over time - rose from 0% to 42.2% of the market;
* Interest Only home loans - where the borrower only has to cover the interest due, leaving the principal for repayment sometime in the far future - rose from 0.1% to 35.6%;
* Silent Seconds, issued on the back of outstanding loans to the most vaguely-related people, rose from 0.1% to 38.7%;
* Low Documentation - where the greater the lie, the greater the loan - rose from 57% to 79.8%.
In short, the US mortgage market switched from cautious Fixed-Rate borrowing to head-in-the-sand ARMs...while the underlying debt was left untouched or actually grew larger...as borrowers struggled to meet just the interest alone after fudging the numbers to bag a loan they could never repay.

Most shocking of all, as Robert Rodriguez of First Pacific Advisors has noted, "is that the origination volumes for the last two years, when the most egregious deterioration in underwriting standards occurred, total more than the previous seven years of originations combined."

And this poor-quality debt has been sold to pension funds, very carefully staying just under a crucial limit:

"24% of all the hyper-leveraged assets managed by large hedge funds (US$1 billion or more) internationally, belong to pension funds and endowments," says a June 18 report from Greenwich Associates, as quoted by Paul Gallagher in the Executive Intelligence Review. "This average is just below the 25% limit at which an individual hedge fund, under the [US] Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) as modified in 2006, becomes an investment advisor with fiduciary responsibility for the pension fund doing the investing - something hedge funds obviously do not want to do."

More than that, pension funds have also stumped up one-fifth of the money held in 'hedge funds of funds', the aggregating super-funds run by many large banks. In first-half 2007, around 40% of current flows into the hedge fund industry has come from pension funds. And "as pension fund money is coming in," says Gallagher, "it's allowing 'smart' money to get out."

...Numerous reports, including a new one from Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research, Inc., have shown 'high net-worth individuals' reducing their net hedge fund investments by half, between 2006 and 2007 - investing instead into real property and stocks. They now account for only about 20% of the assets of hedge funds, which were supposedly made for them."

Instead of high-net-worth billionaires, it's now Joe Public left holding this junk, thanks of course to his well-paid retirement fund managers...

Giving control of your money to a financial "expert" might indeed prove the most foolish decision of all.

To me, this is outrageous. I've written earlier about a brokers' meeting I attended in 1999, where a rep from a technology fund burbled enthusiastically about the "super-boom" to come, and how I felt that the smart money was looking to use us to sell their holdings to suckers. And I think the same happened with the Lloyds of London scandal - advisers were encouraged to help their clients get a seat on what they thought was the gravy train, when the insiders knew it was the vinegar bottle. Now it seems we've seen effectively a raid on pension funds.

I sometimes suspect that the money system is not for storing wealth, but for stealing it.

The authorities should be busting the offenders, not bailing them. We should pay off depositors so they can put their savings elsewhere, re-educate naive financial advisers and institutional fund managers, and bankrupt the swindlers.

Here in England, London's Central Criminal Court has a motto above the entrance:

"Defend the Children of the Poor & Punish the Wrongdoer"

If I were an American, I'd be asking questions about justice and the rule of law: does the nation still protect the weak against the strong? Meanwhile, now that you know how the game is played, find a way to win honourably.

.................... A South Sea Bubble playing card

Thirty donkeys and a boiled frog

The Mogambo Guru (Richard Daughty) says that a modern US dollar buys what you could have got for about 2 cents in 1913. The same is true of the UK.

The question is, can this go on indefinitely? Is it like slowly boiling a frog, or will the frog never die? Doomsters are looking for a final cataclysm, but there have been periodic bubbles and busts for a very long time.

Maybe inflation is simply a slow crime, openly and unendingly committed against savers. We worry about interest rates, market crashes, insolvencies and unemployment, and miss the big story because it's so obvious:

The smuggler

Every first of the month the Mullah would cross the border with thirty donkeys with two bales of straw on each. Each time the custom person would ask the Mullah's profession and the Mullah would reply, "I am an honest smuggler."

So each time The Mullah, his donkeys and the bales of straw would be searched from top to toe. Each time the custom folk would not find anything. Next week the Mullah would return without his donkeys or bales of straw.

Years went by and the Mullah prospered in his smuggling profession to the extent that he retired. Many years later the custom person too had retired. As it happened one day the two former adversaries met in a country far from home. The two hugged each other like old buddies and started talking.

After a while the custom person asked the question which had been bugging him over the years, "Mullah, please let me know what were you smuggling all those years ago?"

The mullah thought for a few seconds and finally revealed his open secret, "Donkeys."

From UKSufi.co.uk

I think the ultimate-crash predictions are an expression of the desire for Justice to arrive, like a deus ex machina. Perhaps it's better simply not to be the victim oneself.

Or saddle 'em up for the Gold Rush?

Illustration from THE GOLD RUSH DIARY OF FRANK McCREARY (1850)

More old news

Thomas Nast: "The Comet of Chinese Labour" (1870)

The use of cheap foreign labour to undercut unionised American workers and benefit big business, is not new. But as this cartoon shows, it is easy, perhaps politic, to focus on the foreigner, who after all is merely trying to earn a living like the rest of us, and deserves decent treatment, out of common humanity.

"Pacific Chivalry" (August 7 1869)

How do we get a balance between the advantages of international trade, and the obligation of each State to look after its own people?

Dow predictions revisited

I wondered recently about the growth of the Dow relative to the FTSE since 1987, and speculated that it could fall by anything up to 50%. David Tice of Prudent Bear thought the same back in May, so maybe I'm not crazy.

Robert McHugh in Safe Haven predicted on 9 July that the Dow could be heading for 9,000 points, "although if the PPT responds by hyperinflating the money supply, it could be 9,000 in real dollars (gold adjusted), not nominal." The London Gold fix on Friday 6 July 2007 was $661.25 and the Dow at close on that day was 13,649.97, i.e. 20.64 times the gold price per ounce. Dropping to 9,000 as defined would mean a "gold multiple" of 13.61 times, or a 34% relative reduction in share prices.

Perhaps it could happen as a combination of nominal share price reduction, and a devaluation of the dollar.

Not so funny money

"By inflation you will burst - let well enough alone, and don't make it worse" (Thomas Nast, 20 December 1873)

Captions: (1) UNCLE SAM-"You stupid Money-Bag! there is just so much Money in you; and you can not make it any more by blowing yourself up." (2) Money is tight, but let it recover itself naturally, and then it will stand on a sounder basis. (3) Stimulants or inflation only bring final collapse.

The Contrarian Investor reviews the central bank intervention figures from Thursday and Friday. Totting them up, I see that's over a quarter of a trillion dollars added to the system in two days.

I cannot imagine that kind of money. But if you now invested that two-day $266.65 billion spree in US Treasury 10-year bonds at the current yield of 4.51%, it would create a secure income of over $12 billion a year.

The world's most expensive house used to belong to the king of yellow journalism. Randolph Hearst's spread is now going for around $160 million dollars. The interest on this central bank splurge would buy six of these houses every month. (At least that would be a solid support for house prices, at the top end.)

But let's put it another way. According to Jerry Bowyer in National Review Online yesterday (reproduced by CBS), the average sub-prime mortgage is for $200,000 and there are 254,000 mortgages currently in foreclosure. This works out at $50.8 billion dollars. It also means that the latest central bank cash injection is sufficient to buy out all current US mortgage foreclosures - five times over! Seemingly, it would be far cheaper for the central banks to take over this housing and rent it out.

So the real damage has been caused by the insane, or maybe one could term it criminal, leverage and speculation. The money experts are responsible for this debacle and the authorities are rushing to save them (and us) from the full consequences of their actions. This is almost a perfect example of creating a moral hazard.