_____________________________________
Loyalty vs. Treason
What bench marks do we have to help us decide between
Loyalty and Treason? What is it to be loyal to one’s country or to betray one’s
country?
In the United Kingdom we have a Parliamentary democracy headed
by the King or Queen.
How does Parliament work?
Parliament is made up of three things:
- The House of Commons in
which our elected representatives sit;
- The House of Lords in
which the Lords Spiritual (the Bishops) and the Lords Temporal (the Barons)
sit;
- The King or Queen, who
sits in the House of Lords, being the top Baron in the Kingdom.
The King is born of the Common Law: he is part hereditary,
part elected. The King has advisors who were originally the important men in
the Kingdom; these developed into the Saxon Witan and the Witan into a
Parliament as we now know it. This is how it should work.
The different types of law
The oldest is the common law, which started out as a set of
rules to allow people to live together in harmony.
Then there is constitutional law. This in large measure is a
confirmation of the rules of the common law by the King and by a charter. Such
constitutional laws are the Charter of Liberties 1100, Magna Carta 1215, the
Petition of Right 1628, and the 1689 Bill of Rights.
Finally, there is statute law. There is a great deal of misunderstanding
of statute law. Parliament itself was born of the common law and the common law
gave Parliament the right to clarify the common law and as society developed
and the common law was unable to supply a remedy, to make law by statute to
provide a new remedy. Statute law is real law, but only as long as the statute
complies with the spirit of the common law, which can be very basically
described as “do no harm”.
What are loyalty and
treason?
Loyalty to the King and the Kingdom is a duty imposed on us
all in exchange for the protection afforded to us by the King.
Treason is a breach of our duty of loyalty to the King or
the Kingdom.
It is important to understand these things if we are going
to understand what follows.
The growth of the
power of the Commons
Since 1420 when the House of Commons demanded and got the
right to initiate all legislation, the Commons has been on a power grab.
In 1609 the Commons wrote to the House of Lords describing
themselves as the Knights, Burgess's and Barons, of the High Court of Parliament.
The House of Lords replied saying that under no circumstances world they accept
the Commons as Barons of Parliament and without the Lords they were no court at
all.
In 1667 the Commons told the Lords they could not amend a
money bill. A ten-year row ensued but in 1677 the Lords agreed not to amend
money bills. This had far-reaching and unforeseen consequences, consequences
which have had devastating effects on the Kingdom.
In 1909 the government of Asquith put forward a budget which
promised the common man a pension. The House of Lords looked at this and
believing they could not amend a money bill, and realising the extra tax needed
to fund this pension was more than the common man could afford on top of the
taxes they already paid, they rejected the budget.
Asquith told the Lords he was putting a bill forward to
prevent the Lords from rejecting a bill. The Lords said they would reject it,
but Asquith said he would put 500 new lords into the Upper House and they would
vote for its abolition. The Lords caved in.
The bill was put before King Edward VII who rejected it on
the grounds that it removed a protection from his subjects and it was
unconstitutional. The King ordered Asquith to go to the country.
Asquith and his ministers went around the country telling
everyone those horrible Lords would not let the working man have a pension. The
Lords felt it was beneath them to out their side. Asquith was re-elected and
the 1911 Parliament was passed into law, King Edward saying when he opened
Parliament that the only reason he was putting this forward was because his
ministers told him he must.
This was the end of Parliament as a democratic body. It
placed the House of Commons in the position of being able to do anything it
wanted to without any restraint.
The removal of legal
safeguards against foreign power
As a result the House of Commons were able to repeal laws
like the 1351 Statute of Provisors, which prevented the disposal of English
assets to a foreign owner, and the 1351 Act of Praemunire, which forbade the
importation of any foreign law into England or for any of his Bishops to
excommunicate any of his subjects on the orders of the Pope, or for any of his
subjects to be drawn out of England to be tried in foreign courts. These two
major laws were designed to protect the Kingdom.
Edward Heath, the
EEC, treason and sedition
It was the removal of these two ancient laws which allowed
Edward Heath to put through his 1972 European Communities Act. When Edward
Heath signed the Treaty of Rome he surrendered our fishing grounds, a very
valuable English asset to the EEC; and on that day we imported more law than we
had made for ourselves in the previous 700 years: some 2,000 extra laws in one
day.
Edward Heath had a duty of Loyalty to Her Majesty and he had
taken the oath of a Privy Councillor in which he swore to uphold and defend all
Her Majesty's Rights, Privileges, Pre-eminences, and Prerogatives. When he put
through the 1972 EEC Act he knew he was surrendering this Kingdom to foreign
rule, entirely contrary to the oaths he had taken. Edward Heath had committed
high treason against Her Majesty, contrary to the 1351 Treason Act, and high
treason against the people of England and the English Constitution.
Every European treaty since has surrendered more powers to
govern to a foreign power. Joining the European Union has been an act of high
treason against the Queen and people of this United Kingdom by those in
government.
By doing this Edward Heath had imagined the death of Her
Majesty as a Sovereign Queen, which is high treason contrary to the 1351
Treason Act. He had also subverted the English Constitution, the major crime of
Sedition at Common Law and at this level of sedition and act of high treason
against the English Constitution and Her Majesty’s subjects.
All original material is copyright of its author. Fair use permitted. Contact via comment. Unless indicated otherwise, all internet links accessed at time of writing. Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog; or for unintentional error and inaccuracy.
1 comment:
I wrote a lovely comment and it disappeared when I clicked the publish button.
To sum up: I agree with every word.
CR.
Post a Comment