Friday, March 12, 2021

FRIDAY MUSIC: Carl Perkins, by JD

One of the architects of rock & roll, Carl Perkins is best known as the writer and original singer of the rockabilly anthem “Blue Suede Shoes” (#2, 1956). Along with Jerry Lee Lewis, Johnny Cash, and Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins was one of the seminal rockabilly artists on Sam Phillips’ Sun label in Memphis.

"Blue Suede Shoes" is one of the first rock-and-roll records. In its style it incorporated elements of blues, country and the pop music of the time. Here is Perkins with Scotty Moore (Elvis Presley's guitarist) performing the song as a Tribute to Elvis:









Thursday, March 11, 2021

Meghan distracts us from our loss of civil liberties

I don't care what the weatherman says, as Louis Armstrong sang. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQBfYZcBSPA Even Piers Morgan can't be wrong about everything, and when weathermxn Alex Beresford attempted to lecture him on his failure to collude with the mythology Meghan is trying to construct around herself he walked off set (see below - had he planned to do so all along?), dogpiled with 41,000 complaints from the gullible public.


The Duchess has been tapping into the Dianolatry that subsequently shook the Monarchy on the Princess' death in 1997. This photo collage doing the rounds on Facebook makes the point:


Not only does this 'mess with the heads' of the sentimental among the populace but it may serve as an extra hook into the psyche of Prince Harry, who aged twelve lost the beautiful mother that Meghan has been mimicking.

How much further will she take it? She has already driven a wedge between Harry and his brother, and cost him the Captain-Generalship of the Royal Marines (earned not least by his brave service in Afghanistan.) Heaven forbid she continues Diana's trajectory into marital difficulties, but we have already seen Oprah Winfrey cast as Martin Bashir, interviewing the poor, put-upon victim of alleged Palace bullying. 

In Meghan's case, the 'third person in the marriage' has been the camera, starting long before the ceremony; I could wish that when filmed and photographed she looked at her husband more than, and with at least as much love as, at the lens.

Mention of the ceremony leads us to the couple's claim to have been married clandestinely three days before the Windsor Castle celebration; a claim at first passively reported in the news media passim - perhaps another example of how much journalism has become internet copy-taking by cub reporters:

'... We called the Archbishop and we just said, look, this thing, this spectacle is for the world. But we want our union between us, so the vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury...

'Added Harry, 'Yeah, just the three of us.''

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a35757534/meghan-markle-prince-harry-secret-married-before-wedding/

Pace Oprah's uncritical complicity with her interviewees, this assertion bears on the Duchess' truthfulness and so lends weight to Morgan's assessment; for the 'pre-wedding wedding' cannot have been valid.

In this country (excluding Scotland) a wedding must take place in an authorised location and inside a permanent structure (not, for example, in a marquee); no such outbuilding appears to be in the 'backyard' of Kensington Palace's Nottingham Cottage. The public must have access to the venue, and there must be at least two witnesses; neither requirement appears to have been fulfilled. Also, where was the advance declaration?

The Arhcbishop of Canterbury has maintained silence on this matter, presumably unwilling to be seen to contradict the Duchess, though this has not prevented her father from characterising her as a 'liar' https://www.newidea.com.au/meghan-markle-dad-letter-sue-documentary-court-case or her half-sister Samantha from calling her a 'narcissist' and 'sociopath.' https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-markle-unloads-on-fathers-betrayal-and-unknown-halfsister-samantha-markle-fires-back/news-story/536199aab9dd492c2e1e28ab92fea484

Let us be charitable and say it was a 'stretcher' - a misinterpretation, deliberate or unintentional, of some rehearsal or blessing - rather than a complete fabrication; but in a courtroom it would damage the credibility of her evidence generally. 'Recollections may vary,' as the Palace's depth-charge phrase has said. https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1407379/Royal-Family-latest-Queen-response-meghan-markle-prince-harry-interview-end-of-monarchy However, the Prince was ready to back her up - a readiness guyed by Black Country comedienne 'Doreen Tipton':

I would pay good money to see the pair interviewed again, but this time by the mercilessly interrogative Judge Judy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Judy

Meghan won't win in her attempts to destroy the Monarchy, though, if that's what she's after rather than a Tinseltown career as 'wronged woman.' 

Among the many reasons why is the existence of the Privy Council, that secretive and autocratic organisation to which the real power of the country has been devolved for centuries and of which all Prime Ministers and Cabinet ministers are automatically members. No Crown, no Privy Council.

No outsider will be allowed to throw a spanner into the engine, with its almost unlimited potential for arbitrary power; a capacity explored by an unscrupulous Tony Blair and his accomplices as soon as New Labour hit the ground running, starting with the meeting on 3 May 1997 that gave the PM the right to nominate three people to give political orders to the Civil Service https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/247039/response/605821/attach/3/3%20May%201997%20Civil%20Service%20Amendment%20Order%20in%20Council%201997.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1.

Tony Benn warned many years ago - and I'm sorry not to have the link - that our freedoms could be swept away in an afternoon by Order In Council. That magic wand, plus Blair's Civil Contingencies Act 2004 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/36/contents and the increasing use of secondary legislation has seen a coup against British civil liberties that has led - under an allegedly Conservative PM - to the entire country being held under open arrest and a prey to overempowered uniformed prodnosing and bullying. 

The Hollywood Princess has no idea what she has taken on, and she can save all her posturing and bloviating for the mirror, mirror on the wall. For our part, we need to turn away from this frivolity and address the loss of our habits of liberty that we misunderstood as our inalienable rights.

Monday, March 08, 2021

FACT CHECK TIME: Meghan and Harry's secret pre-marriage marriage

"... We called the Archbishop and we just said, look, this thing, this spectacle is for the world. But we want our union between us, so the vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury and that was the piece that...

"Added Harry, "Yeah, just the three of us.""

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a35757534/meghan-markle-prince-harry-secret-married-before-wedding/

Here is guidance on marriage under the law of England and Wales:

The marriage must take place in a registered building. Not all buildings are registered, so it is important to check first with your local authority. If the building is not registered then the marriage will not be legally recognised.

The ceremony itself can take any form, provided that:

  1. it is in public
  2. there are at least two witnesses present
  3. either a registrar of the district in which the ceremony is taking place or an authorised person is present
  4. both parties make the necessary declarations, for example, declaring that there are no lawful objections to the marriage

I don't know whether the garden of a 'cottage on the grounds of Kensington Palace' is/was a registered building, but clearly the Archbishop of Canterbury is authorised to conduct marriages.

However:

(1) To be valid, a marriage has to be in public - i.e. the public must have access to the place where it is to be contracted; and

(2) There must be at least two witnesses to the marriage

As I've said in the madhouse that is Facebook:

Now let Meghan be interviewed by 
Judge Judy. Oh please, oh please!

There are exceptions - for example, where one or both of the contracting parties is very ill and cannot be moved; but even then two witnesses are required, even if the ceremony is carried out by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Am I wrong? Put me right, somebody -  but not the newspapers who, right up to the Telegraph, have repeated this seeming bilge unquestioningly.

Sunday, March 07, 2021

SOMETHING FOR THE WEEKEND: The Digital World - Not All Good, by Wiggia

Running parallel to my recent move was the horrendous amount of time and effort required to inform all parties of new details, address, phone etc.

It’s not that long ago a change of address card was all that was required to send to all concerned and have your details amended, but that is so last decade; now instead of giving your details to the local card printing firm and mailing them off when printed you have to spend a couple of days, if you have the will and stamina, going through passwords, usernames, secret locations, last three digits of your phone number, 2nd 5th and 8th item of your account number, date of birth, old address and God help you if you have forgotten one or more of them.

Some to be fair are reasonably straightforward presuming you are au fait with the internet; with others some it makes no difference they are fiendishly over complicated and many do not respond in kind, they are a deliberate trap for the unwary.

Whilst Google is not involved in this list of people and organisations to be notified anyone who has lost their Google password will know what I mean, it is a catch 22 situation: ‘forgotten your password? Click here and we will send an email': email arrives, 'follow link to reset your password', click link, 'before you can go on please fill in with your old password' - errrrr... and a day later you have cracked it or not, as in one case they refused to accept my new password I had struggled so hard to set up and still wanted my old that I didn’t have.

That has absolutely, other than as an illustration, nothing to do with the countless organisations one has to inform if you move home. There used to be a rather good shortcut as regards all sorts of cards that could be lodged with CPP who would inform all those CC providers with the new details saving you the trouble; not any more, you are on your own. Why it changed I don’t know but it has lost value as that was one of the reasons I joined it.

I have just for instance had to update details on my Halifax account. I log in to the website and am then told you can only change your details using your phone app, why is not explained. I do have the app but never use it, as I have no need to, but in for a penny... I open the app and put in my password and am told the app needs updating; I press the update key, and a sign comes up telling me it will only update with a 4G phone. I am already losing patience, but I do have a new phone that is 4G, not that I would know the difference, so I read the instructions and download the app onto that phone and follow the ten steps, yes ten, you need to do to set it up including endlessly putting in your password when you finally get to the bit where you can change your details.

After that, and it took a total of forty minutes, I awarded myself a keep calm award, as it is not in my nature to suffer these things, normally I simply log off and write a letter - isn’t that and the phone how we used to do these things anyway, before the digital age?


Now though, many companies make sure there are no phone numbers to contact them with, and you are forced to use the web site. If you still can’t get to where you want or it is so convoluted that you can see no way, you often see the welcoming sign come up in the corner marked 'live chat'; this can, I stress can, be a boon, but in many cases is far from it. What you often get is “Hi, I am Doris can I help you today”, and then they go away for a day; after an interminable wait between messages you can also end up with “we cannot process your request on here” and you get a phone number to dial which involves memorable names, passwords, account numbers etc and if you give up and say I have forgotten them another list of items you do not readily have at hand are demanded; by then it is a large Scotch time.

It’s all done for us they say, security in this day and age online is paramount, except of course it is us doing all the hard work and not the providers.

While going through all the organisations that I need to contact to change my details or profile as they term it today - I always thought profile was what you had on a Penny Black! - anyway, other ways to identify your good self are appearing. I will not ask if they are necessary, but fingerprint recognition sounds a bit worrying: what if your prints are already on file, does that bar you from usage? Many people have their fingerprints on file and they are not removed by the Police as it is. Face recognition was also mentioned; I have no intention of doing a phone booth impression into my phone to get access to anything; perhaps we should all go the whole hog and put together a short singing dancing Tik Tok video that we introduce for entry to these sites, along the lines of ‘my name is x and I live at y and it rhymes with my memorable name and password’ all to a choreographed dance pinched from Fred Astaire.... I am sure we are not far off something like that.

I also had a request from the Electoral Commission to register to vote. Amazingly this involved a very simple short online form that took no time at all to fill in, all you need is the number on the letter, but there was a strange line under the request aying that if you did not return the form filled in or complete the online form you can be fined £80. As it is not compulsory to vote in this country how can they fine you for something you have a choice over? All very Orwellian.

But my piece de resistance in all this was my internet provider and yes I will name names, it was Plusnet. I was with Plusnet at the previous property so all should have been simple. Numerous emails came telling me all was well and my service would start on the 10th of Feb; we move in, I plug in as per instructions and await another email. A couple of hours later bingo! the email arrives and I can plug in my hub and get going - only my phone line is dead, it has no dialling tone and the hub refuses to show anything but red.

I wait as sometimes connection does not follow immediately but it is till dead as a dodo. I phone and get a helpful chap who listens to my story and suggests that I wait 24 hours for a refresher! And if nothing then phone again. It is obvious, because sod's law says it is, that in 24 hours nothing will happen, and nothing does. I phone again and the fun starts: all operatives are working from home and no one has a clue as to what the previous one has done or said.

Meanwhile I am getting emails or messages telling me the line has been checked and all is hunky dory; it isn’t it is still dead. New man suggests we cancel an account; I have no knowledge of what he cancelled but again the following day still nothing and an engineer from Open Reach will be with me on Friday Saturday or Monday which is helpful. The messages responding to my complaint still come telling me the engineers have checked the line and all is still well. I give up and await the engineer.

Naturally he doesn’t appear Friday or Saturday or Monday. Late Monday I phone again; this time someone who knows what he is talking about answers the phone. It appears for reasons beyond the grave that they have been checking my line at my old address and there is nothing wrong with that line, but then I don’t live there any more. The man delves deeper and says someone earlier made a big cock-up when closing my new account at the new address which answers the emails I am getting saying ‘sorry to lose you’ and it is decided another new account in a few days will take effect at a lower rate to compensate for my troubles; that leaves me with no phone or internet until then and I am left with no choice.

As I put the phone down the man from Openreach appears, my story is told again and he confirms they have been checking my old line, not this one and it has ben dormant for a year anyway as I informed them at the start. The man fixes various meters and gauges to the output plug and says he is going down the road to find the errant wiring. Over two hours later he returns, plugs all in and we wait; ten minutes later I am online - and have a phone with my old number that I don’t want as I have informed all the earlier organisations of the new number and the insurance ones charge to change details! Another con for another day, and to change back would incur more costs.

Meanwhile as I have set up yet another account the ‘sorry to lose you’ messages start again and then the ones with the new account arrive still with my old number, so I go back on the phone to clarify that I have absolutely no desire to retain my old number. The conversation was akin to a sketch from the Fast Show, with the operator continually asking if I wanted to keep the old number and me continually saying no I want the new one as shown on the new account; why he persisted is a mystery.

Then the post arrives with a parcel from Plusnet with a new hub, why? So again on the phone to discover I have no need of the new and all will be fine on the day, and mercy me it was. Anyone want a hub, still in packing unused and ready to go?

What anyone gleans from all this is their affair, for me it is a simple stating of a fact: it was much quicker and a lot simpler before the digital age. The internet has some wonderful attributes but it also has some appalling areas that are a waste of time and effort.

Saturday, March 06, 2021

President Biden makes an appearance!



Rumours of President Biden's alleged cognitive difficulties were quelled as POTUS made a public appearance earlier today in order to sign another thirty Executive Orders, which he proceeded to do rapidly and with a flourish, not even pausing to read them.

The full face covering and gloves were appropriate protection against coronavirus, explained Mr Biden, pointing up the recklessness of certain States that have recently chosen to relax rules designed to protect the citizenry.

In answer to a journalist's query about his health, the President said "He's just - I mean I'm just fine. In fact I've grown a couple inches, as you can see."

America can relax: the nation is in safe, strong hands.

___________________________________________________________________________________

The above article has been verified by independent fact-checkers at AbsoluteTruth and TrustUs

Friday, March 05, 2021

FRIDAY MUSIC: Heart, by JD

There was a comment beneath one of these videos which said "I love how Youtube is the closest thing to a time machine we have." And that is very true where music is concerned. The world's entire musical catalogue is more or less available 'on demand' even the most obscure folk tunes from faraway places as well as various transcriptions of what are allegedly the first known tunes from Ancient Greece or Egypt.

It is also a reminder of music we may have known and subsequently forgotten and that is understandable with the huge amount of music we have heard and enjoyed over the years. 

And so it was that one of YT's recommendations reminded me of the sisters Ann Wilson and Nancy Wilson (the latter not to be confused with the jazz singer of the same name) who were part of a band called Heart, formed in 1970. 












The YT recommendation which alerted me was the final video here, a splendid version of Stairway to Heaven performed for the three surviving members of Led Zeppelin in 2012 :

Monday, March 01, 2021

The Government are Covidrunkards

 “I think politics is an instrument of the Devil. Just that clear. I think politics is what kills; it doesn’t bring anything alive.” 


In the previous post about Long Covid, Professor Chris Whitty on the fifth of May 2020 said

 "....the great majority of people, even the very highest groups, if they catch this virus [covid19] will not die."

I have received in the post a Government booklet entitled "Covid-19 vaccination, a guide for older adults" and on the very last page it states "We do not yet know whether it [the vaccine] will stop you catching and passing on the virus."

Adding those two things together suggests that this 'vaccine' we are all being strongly urged to have will not protect us against a virus which is not going to kill us anyway!

That is almost surreal in its absurdity - the virus will not kill you but we will pretend to protect you by giving you this untested vaccine which is not a vaccine because it is normally used for gene therapy!

"The mRNA vaccinations are a form of gene therapy, according to its definition in many parts of the world, including Europe. Gene therapies remain under strict regulation and few gene therapeutics have been approved by health authorities because of safety concerns."
https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/83947/covid-mrna-vaccines-are-a-form-of-gene-therapy

These 'vaccines which are not vaccines' are also causing serious side effects. This is not well reported by the news media but it is sufficiently serious for the authorities to set up a compensation scheme in the USA, and the UK followed suit in December 2020.

(Total compensation paid out in 2019 for all vaccines was a total of $225,457,657.94 paid to both petitioners and their attorneys. - https://shannonlawgroup.com/how-much-money-has-vicp-paid-injured-by-vaccines/ )

I went back to Bruce Charlton's blog and this post which is dated 16th March 2020, i.e. before the first 'lockdown' and before the Government publication of 19th March which removed covid19 from the list of High Consequences Infectious Diseases (that page updated on 17th June with no further change in status of covid)
Dr Charlton states quite clearly- 

"So the birdemic [covid19] crisis is fake. Why then do we have a crisis?

"Because of the response; which is not fake, and indeed amounts to the very-rapid and universal imposition of a bureaucratic totalitarian police state; run (because such are the people involved) on atheistic, leftist, anti-Christian lines."
https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2020/03/dont-blame-crows-its-not-about-birdemic.html

Bruce knows what he is talking about - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Charlton

The aforementioned Professor Whitty would have known when he made that statement in May 2020 as Dr Charlton knew also, that covid 19 was not a serious problem which is why he said "....the great majority of people, even the very highest groups, if they catch this virus will not die."

So why has the past twelve months been one long panic over a minor cold/flu variant? Why has our economy been closed down for most of the past year? Why is the Government throwing away money in a furlough scheme which allows people to sit at home and not work? Most important of all; why has the Government given millions of pounds to the pharmaceutical companies for an unnecessary and pointlessly ineffective vaccine?

Over the past year there have been almost daily briefings from the Government about the 'crisis' and the newspapers and TV have echoed the Government's narrative, adding a multitude of scare stories of their own. There have been many health professionals who have questioned the validity of the Government's actions and these voices have been censored. Where is the open and honest discussion of the Great Barrington Declaration for example? https://gbdeclaration.org/#read

"As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection."

Currently the Declaration has been signed by 41,458 medical practitioners, 13,705 medical and public health scientists as well as 754,468 members of the public. That is a lot of medical experts who do not agree with the Government's current response to the covid virus. How many medical experts are the Government relying on, who are they and what is their level of experience in their respective fields? 

There is also concern for the mental health of the public who are subject to the daily diet of bad news by way of listing the daily death count as well as telling us we are all walking biohazards! Bad news sells papers but bad news has a negative effect on our immune systems which is something perfectly illustrated by the Stanley Holloway monologue My Word You Do Look Queer. - https://monologues.co.uk/Stanley-Holloway/You-Do-Look-Queer.htm

The daily diet of bad news is a form of brainwashing and is possibly deliberate given that the Government's advisers, the Sage Committee, contains behavioural psychologists as well as sociologists (no real 'hard' scientists you will notice.)

"We are all affected by the influence of suggestion. We merely vary in the degree to which we respond to it. By systematic suggestions, multitudes can be made through propaganda to act as a unit, even though there had been no previous attachment to the ideas communicated. Under the stress of emotional stimuli, we are led to commit acts that we normally would never dream of perpetrating. The protagonists of propaganda know this well, and thereby exercise their power to create conditions that will make their assault on the public mind more successful. Political agitators, also aware of mass susceptibilities, work on this disposition for their own purposes, thus demonstrating that individuals, groups, and nations can all be made to act in a manner that suggests the influence of hypnosis".
- Melvin Powers, Hypnotherapist.
https://www.paulguydurbin.com/melvin-powers.html

Given all of the above the question remains; why is the Government perpetuating this crisis and why the seemingly never ending campaign to have everyone be given 'the jab'? Are they concerned for the nation's health? That is unlikely when they refuse to engage with the authors of the Barrington Declaration and when other proven remedies are readily available. 

The only possible answer is, in the old saying, power has corrupted them. Not so much in the comical story of the Emporer's new clothes but in the insanity of Caligula's promoting his horse - "According to Suetonius, Caligula had plans to make his favorite horse, Incitatus, a consul. Why? Because he was insane and thought a horse was a man? Or because he was drunk on power and would enjoy seeing everyone else assiduously “not noticing” that the consul was a horse?"
https://narrowdesert.blogspot.com/2021/02/incitatus.html

Our Government is drunk on power! This is not a crisis, it is a scandal! The evidence from the Office of National Statistics indicates that the 'covid pandemic' had fizzled out by May or June of 2020. shttps://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/deathsinvolvingcovid19interactivemap/2020-06-12

It is time to remove ALL restrictions. It is time to open all the pubs before they are lost forever, it is time to open all the sports venues, it is time to throw away the reported 52 billion masks which have been sold worldwide; sorry, not throw away, they should be returned to the manufacturers for their disposal!

It is time to remove this Government before they destroy the country completely - 2020 saw the biggest drop in GDP since 1709! https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/02/12/economy-shrinks-99pc-record-annual-contraction/

There are hopeful signs that the covid scandal may be ending with this story in the daily Mail about the misreporting by the NHS of covid deaths:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9305405/Grieving-relatives-demand-inquiry-loved-ones-wrongly-certified-virus-victims.html

I have no doubt that similar stories will begin to emerge as more and more people begin to see the adverse reactions to the 'vaccines' including fatalities. According to Pfizer's own records there were 197 deaths between 9/12/20 and 14/02/21 from the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA injection.
(On the very last page of this pdf file)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/964207/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print__1_.pdf

Let the law suits begin! Not against the Government as a whole because we will end up paying any fines but against every individual Minister and adviser for each of them to be held personally liable. If that cannot be done, why can it not be done? These people need to be held accounable for all of the lost businesses and ruined lives, pour encourager les autres!

...... and a final word on politicians from the late Michael Bentine:

"As I have grown older, a nagging thought has bothered me. During my sixty-six years of lifeI have heard people, in moments of crisis, cry out: It's all right! Here comes the doctor..... or the surgeon, the midwife, the police, the fire brigade, the rescue squad, the paramedics, the priest, or even the plumber. But in all those years, during dire emergencies in peace and war, I have never once heard the words. Thank God, the Politician has arrived!"
- Michael Bentine in his book Open Your Mind https://www.abebooks.co.uk/products/isbn/9780593015384