It's time for 'Pick of the (Mediaeval) Pops!' Some of these sound surprisingly modern and you will notice a certain amount of singing and dancing in taverns: there are some traditions which will never die!
Friday, April 12, 2019
Tuesday, April 09, 2019
State Power, Home Education and Mission Creep
I suppose two April Fool jokes was felt to be over-egging
the pudding. On the first working day after March 29th we found
ourselves still in the EU and Ministers are still laughing about that one; the
announcement of a home-schooled children register was held over till April 2nd.
My friends educated their three children at home. Two went
on to do second degrees and the third has such personality that he has gone to
the other side of the world and found jobs for which he wasn’t technically
qualified – but which he soon learned to do, well.
‘Please, I've only got so many ribs, Noel Coward,’ as RikMayall’s Richie said. (Not that your ribs belong to you, either, from April (1st?) nextyear;
not unless you have found that opt-out page buried in the NHS Organ Donation Register – and provided the doctors remember
to check it.)
This is the big theme of our age: the Power versus the
People.
At present, the Education Act 1996 says the same as its 1944 predecessor,
except for the addition of the special needs aspect:
The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause him to
receive efficient full-time education suitable —
(a) to his age, ability and aptitude, and
(b) to any special educational needs he may have, either by regular
attendance at school or otherwise.
There are various reasons why the State may feel the need to
intervene, but please note the order in which they appear in the announcement:
A register of children not in school will transform a local council’s
capacity to identify and intervene where the standard
of a child’s education isn’t good enough or, in the rare instances,
where they are at risk of harm. It will also help the authorities spot young
people who may be receiving a solely religious education, attending an
unregistered school or not receiving an education at all.
The word ‘efficient’ has remained undefined for the last 75
years, but it is a hinge on which the great door of officialdom can – and will
- turn open.
Yet what if you turn the question round: why would you send
your child to school?
One answer is socialisation. But this is exactly why some
people have withdrawn their offspring: bullying. Anybody here watch Noel
Fitzpatrick, aka TV’s The Supervet ?
A rural farmboy with a gift of empathy with animals, here is his treatment at
secondary school (p.75):
I remember one time going back into class after a particularly bad and
mucky bruising when five boys set on me again, one on each arm, one on each
leg, giving me the bumps, throwing me up in the air, while the fifth came down
hard with his fists on my stomach as I bounced.
It's left its mental marks, even though he struggled on
heroically to become a world-class animal surgeon who has much to teach human
medicine too. Would we have heard of Isaac Newton or Michael Faraday if they’d
been regularly beaten as swots?
Early on, a man from the LEA came round, but soon withdrew
when father adopted the strategy of asking eagerly for materials and financial
contributions. It’s funny how Ofsted and Education Ministers issue librariesful
of advice and instruction to teachers, yet they never fund for a range of
approved coursebooks that deliver the curriculum they are so sure is right for
children. Why don’t they put ‘their’ money where their mouth is?
And I must have missed it: which Ministry philosopher has
managed to answer the millennia-long question, ‘what exactly is education for?’
Friday, April 05, 2019
FRIDAY MUSIC: Pentangle, by JD
Serendipity brought together five exceptional talents for an all too brief period between 1967 and 1973. After six albums they went their separate ways. Pentangle were a 'supergroup' before that term became fashionable; two of this country's finest guitarists plus, from the world of jazz, a first class drummer with a maestro on double bass and all backing the purest female voice in folk music.
And yet, they are largely and unjustifiably forgotten. They are rarely if ever heard on the radio so you can hear them now and relax into a reverie of musical magic with Jacqui McShee, Bert Jansch, John Renbourn, Danny Thompson and Terry Cox!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentangle_(band)
The band have continued in various incarnations and currently perform as Jacqui McShee's Pentangle - http://www.pentangle.info/JMPentangle/HOME.html
And yet, they are largely and unjustifiably forgotten. They are rarely if ever heard on the radio so you can hear them now and relax into a reverie of musical magic with Jacqui McShee, Bert Jansch, John Renbourn, Danny Thompson and Terry Cox!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentangle_(band)
The band have continued in various incarnations and currently perform as Jacqui McShee's Pentangle - http://www.pentangle.info/JMPentangle/HOME.html
Thursday, April 04, 2019
FINAL EXAMINATION PAPER
In order to exclude the ignorant and stupid people who vote the wrong way, your eligibility to take part in the next local elections and the possible snap General Election depends on your answer to the following question:
"Is Jeremy Corbyn worse than Tony Blair?"
Answer with reference to (a) terrorists and (b) making war on a Middle Eastern country that had nothing to do with 9/11.
You may write on both sides of the paper and, in deference to New Labour "triangulation", on the edges as well.
Length: 500 - 1,500 words. NO CARTOONS.
"Is Jeremy Corbyn worse than Tony Blair?"
Answer with reference to (a) terrorists and (b) making war on a Middle Eastern country that had nothing to do with 9/11.
You may write on both sides of the paper and, in deference to New Labour "triangulation", on the edges as well.
Length: 500 - 1,500 words. NO CARTOONS.
Noises From The Echo Chamber
Last night's vote on the Cooper-Letwin Bill, evaluated according to Remainer logic:
1. It's not valid, because the majority won
2. Oh all right, majorities can win but this was by only one person's vote so it's too close and is void for that reason
3. OK it's not void because of the margin, but because somebody probably told a LIE at some point so the vote would have been different if only everybody knew all the details of everything and only told the truth
4. Okay, okay, (3) above happens all the time but those who voted for the Bill are probably nasty people who support things good people don't like so their votes shouldn't count
5 Look, here are cartoons to prove I'm right - ships falling off the edge of the Earth, lemmings jumping off cliffs, effigies of populist politicians shooting themselves in the head
6 Oliver Letwin is posh, need I say more?
7 You're blocked, you troll.
BREXIT: Power To The People
Right then: things keep moving on, and in a bad direction.
Only a couple of weeks ago, Angela Eagle was complaining of the Government’s
bullying towards the Opposition;
now Mrs May says goodbye to collective Cabinet responsibility (a majority havecome round to No-Deal)
and reaches out to Mr Corbyn, prompting Welsh Minister Nigel Adams’ resignation
(good man: his letter is worth reading.)
On and on goes the Prime Minister, despite one smashing
defeat in the Commons after another. She clings to power like a limpet; or
perhaps, more like a limpet mine, primed to sink the ship of State.
This is autocracy.
Perhaps, if all else fails, her last card, the one that
loses the stately pile and rolling acres, will be the use somehow of an Order
in Council (such a favoured tool of Blair, ACL.)
Fanciful? Is there anybody who predicted what we have seen
so far?
When all this Brexit business is done one way or another,
the work of reassessing the British Constitution must begin. Perhaps we could
start with a motion similar to John Dunning’s in 1780,
altered to say: ‘The power of the Prime Minister has increased, is increasing,
and ought to be diminished.’
What is the point of the 2002 High Court ruling that ‘The British Parliament .. being
sovereign… cannot abandon its sovereignty’ if it simply delegates away most of
its power, either to the EU under the 1972 ECA, or to Ministers via ‘Henry
VIII’ clauses that allow them to issue secondary legislation, or to the Privy
Council so that the occupant of No. 10 can govern by fiat?
What is the point of having extended
the franchise to 47 million voters, under a First Past The Post system that
regularly sees some two-thirds of MPs elected on a minority of votes cast? Of
‘safe seats’ that turn some MPs into complacent, negligent absentee landlords?
Or of a Fourth Estate that suppresses
and twists the information the voter needs? – even (this is the one that for me
exploded Jon Snow’s credibility, I can cope with his infantile remarks about
white people) allowing Blair’s right-hand man to take over one’s currentaffairs TV show without warning, to spin the ‘Iraq WMD’ controversy and then shaking his hand in fraternal thanks at the end (oddly, not shown here, but I cannot forget.)
What is at stake here – what greater
theme of history is there? - is overweening Power. We thought we’d settled that
in the 1640s and 1680s and the political reforms in the 150 years after 1789. But
the barrack-room grumblings of the people today could eventually become
something worse, if democratic checks and balances fail to stop Power becoming
once again arbitrary and absolute.
Is the EU prepared to reform? Oh yes
– in exactly the wrong way. Only last November, the enthusiast Mr Verhofstadt
was calling for the abolition of member nations’ individual veto:
‘You cannot manage a continent of that magnitude with such a system.’
Even as it is, AfD leader Alice
Weidel’s much-circulated 21 March speech to the Bundestag worried that the UK’s departure threatens Germans’
ability to muster a blocking minority EU veto (min. 35% of EU population.)
Already, she says, Merkel and Macron’s Aachen Treaty stands to jam open Germany’s wallet for the depredations
of French profligacy and the free movement of eastern Europeans per Schengen
rights have led to growing strains on the German economy under Hartz IV socialsecurity arrangements.
It’s not about us ‘crashing out’ of
the EU; it’s about the EU crashing around like a bull in a china shop. If
no-one will put a ring through its nose, we have to leave the premises. If we
mess about, the Germans may get out ahead of us!
And if we do finally manage it, we then
have to face the other systemic wreckers closer to home: the ones at the top of
our country.
Monday, April 01, 2019
BREXIT: French Leave
Our schools are now required to teach British values. But
what are they? Certainly not Empire, the White Man’s Burden and so on. My
researches indicate that there are only two:
After chiding Ms Merkel for her many expensive policy errors, German AfD leader Alice Weidel’s speech to the Bundestag on 21 March went on to accuse her of “blind loyalty” (3:01) to the French, who want to deny Britain access to the single market. January’s Aachen Treaty on Franco-Germancooperation “had France’s fingerprints all over it” (3:40), benefitting the latter’s inefficient economy but sending much of the bill to the German taxpayer who, once Britain has left, will not be able to command a blocking minority in the Council to prevent fresh fiscal assaults on the biggest remaining economy.
- Animism – not just pagan ritual leftovers like the Abbots Bromley Horn Dance but our deep empathy with pets and farm animals
- A deep distrust of the French (remember Hartlepool’s monkey-hangers)
And now we discover – by a leaked secret memo,
of course, G-d forbid we be told anything openly – that there are three EU
preconditions for even beginning to discuss alterations to the draft Withdrawal
Agreement; conditions that are for us a surrender in advance of the battle.
But though we are divided at home, the EU itself is not
united:
After chiding Ms Merkel for her many expensive policy errors, German AfD leader Alice Weidel’s speech to the Bundestag on 21 March went on to accuse her of “blind loyalty” (3:01) to the French, who want to deny Britain access to the single market. January’s Aachen Treaty on Franco-Germancooperation “had France’s fingerprints all over it” (3:40), benefitting the latter’s inefficient economy but sending much of the bill to the German taxpayer who, once Britain has left, will not be able to command a blocking minority in the Council to prevent fresh fiscal assaults on the biggest remaining economy.
Weidel quoted M. Barnier (5:26) as confiding to a colleague,
“My mission will have been a success when the terms are so brutal for the
British that they prefer to stay in the Union.”
We are not the only ones with national traits. The Germans
love tribal unity and have a lethal penchant for abstract theorising (from
Luther to Karl Marx to the Frankfurt School), but the French combine
theatricality with sharp dealing and calculating selfishness. Think of William
the Conqueror, turning his pratfall on the shore into symbolic seizure of the
land,
then ordering the Domesday Book to count exactly how much he’d grabbed; the 1789
windy Tennis Court Oath that blew off so many of the Revolutionaries’ heads in
the factious struggles that ensued; and Clemenceau’s vindictive 1919 Versailles
Treaty that ruined Germany and so set Europe ablaze a generation later.
Don’t expect anything but gaseous difficulties from a French
lawyer. Frankly, anything that our hapless Government tries to agree now can be
negotiated separately afterwards, when the costs of M. Barnier’s failure begin
to bite the Continent. Let’s go now, without permission – let’s take “French
leave.”
For all we wanted – what we were sold in the 1970s – was
honest dealing and fair trading. What we have had ever since has been
money-twisting and empire-building.
"Un Po Apres Le Temps
d'Autonne"
From “Le Jugement du roy de Navarre” by Guillaume de Machaut (1349)
Translation by "Sackerson"
A
little after autumn time
When
those who cultivate the vine
Pick
their grapes and fill the tun
And
with work that’s lightly done
Each
man offers to his fellow
Pears
and grapes and peaches mellow
When
in the soil the corn-seeds grow
And
the leaf falls from the bough
By
Nature’s or the wind’s design
In
thirteen hundred forty-nine
On
the ninth day of November
I
was closed up in my chamber.
Had
the sky been bright and clear
I
should have gone to take the air
But
the mountains and the meadows
Were
hid in fog and deepest shadows
So
I was taken by the gloom
Thinking
in my lonely room
How
all men everywhere are governed
By
cronies meeting in the tavern
How
truth and justice in the land
Are
dead, slain by the hand
Of
greed, who over them holds reign
As
if she were a sovereign queen
How
the rulers rob the ruled
Sack,
plunder and assault the world
Crushing
them in their distress
Merciless
and pitiless
Great
mischief seems it to my mind
When
vice and power are combined
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)