Friday, June 20, 2025

FRIDAY MUSIC: Madrugada, by JD

Madrugada is a Norwegian alternative rock band formed in Stokmarknes in 1993, with a core lineup of Sivert Høyem (vocals), Robert Burås (guitar), and Frode Jacobsen (bass). Following Burås' death on 12 July 2007, Høyem and Jacobsen decided to finish recording what was to be their final album in the original lineup. On 21 January 2008, the band released Madrugada and announced that they would split after one last tour. They performed their final concert on 15 November 2008.

When Madrugada regrouped to celebrate the 20th Anniversary of their classic debut album «Industrial Silence» in 2019, they quickly realised that interest in the band had not waned in their absence. It had, in fact, increased, not least on the European continent.

What’s more, they realised that they loved being back together. Being in Madrugada had never been quite this much fun.

Says vocalist and guitarist Sivert Høyem: «It was if as the last piece of the puzzle had snapped into place. I’d never felt so self-assured on stage before. It was no stress at all, whereas in the past it had always been very stressful to me.

The tour was a triumph, with the band selling out shows in the their native Norway, plenty of festival dates and a host of concerts throughout Europe, where the band now sold out halls that were twice the size of the places they used to play back in the day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrugada_(band)
https://madrugada.no/#biography

Madrugada - The World Could Be Falling Down (Official Music Video)
Madrugada - Call My Name (Official Music Video)
Madrugada - Majesty (Live from Oslo Spektrum 2005)
Honey Bee
Madrugada - The Riverbed
This Old House

Friday, June 13, 2025

FRIDAY MUSIC: Rock 'n' Roll, by JD

The world is currently shrouded in gloom and doom. We all need cheering up so here is some good old fashioned rock and roll guaranteed to put a smile on everyone's face and I have included some unlikely collaborations which work surprisingly well!

Status Quo - All Around My Hat, Wembley Arena 14th December 1996
Racey - Some Girls (1979) • TopPop
The J. Geils Band - Centerfold (Official Music Video)
The Temperance 7 - Sergeant Pepers Lonely Hearts Club Band.
Electric Light Orchestra - Rock n' Roll Is King (Official Video)
ZZ Top - Gimme All Your Lovin' (Official Music Video) [HD Remaster]
Status Quo and The Beach Boys 'Fun Fun Fun' (Official Video)

Footnote: RIP Brian Wilson (died 11 June 2025), the man who wrote all or most of the Beach Boys songs one of which is included above.

Sunday, June 08, 2025

Discourtesy – PMQs 4th June 2025

The PM’s rough manners and disregard for relevance have worsened.

Jesse Norman MP (Con) raised a point of order at the end of the session, asking the Speaker ‘Could you give us some guidance on whether you may be able to control answers when they are wildly inappropriate?’

The instance Norman cited was when Badenoch asked Starmer about the two-child benefit cap and instead was slapped with a reference to the Kremlin because they appreciated her admission that the Ukraine conflict was a ‘proxy war’ with Russia. (Make that ‘poxy’: not just despicable but contagious and deadly dangerous.)

The Russophobia is a threadbare theme but cheap shots are Sir Keir’s stock in trade; money for old trope? It is curious that he should exploit it now that Russia is a sort of democracy and our country is led by someone suspected of Communistic instincts.

Writing in The Spectator Madeline Grant developed this point, likening the PM to a late-Soviet Leonid Brezhnev assuring us that all is going well. In the Daily Mail Quentin Letts also notes how Starmer has become ‘idly, sarcastically evasive.’

When you have enough power you can speak nonsense to the people but if they protest it’s off to the Lubyanka with them.

And what nonsense it is! Sir Keir’s aggressive 1984-style quacking mismatches responses to queries. Does Reform’s Sarah Pochin suggest banning the burqa, as in several European Countries? She receives a graceless refusal to reply; instead she is told to speak to her leader about unfunded tax cuts; to remember Liz Truss; and anyway I got a rabbit!

Strike that last: Starmer’s egregious arrogance hasn’t yet spilled over into ‘second childishness and mere oblivion.’ But power has gone to his head. Only he can call an early General Election and not even a Labour Party vote of no confidence can remove him. ‘You have me for another four years, ha ha!’

We must be thankful that the PM bothers to face interrogation at all. One of his mentor Tony Blair’s first acts was to consolidate twice-weekly PMQs into a single meeting; as Ian Taylor (Con) then commented, ‘I warmly welcome the Prime Minister to his role of answering questions and I am grateful to him for finding the time in his diary to do so. At some point he might consult the House about these changes.’ Arbitrarily cut down from two, but as Lear’s daughter Regan asks, ‘What needs one?’ Like the old king, we are impotent, must take what we are given.

Here is Sir Keir, commanding an Opposition-crushing Parliamentary majority. He may do as he pleases, for as long as he pleases.

Yet his overwhelming advantage is based on the ballots of only twenty per cent of the electorate. As Tony Benn said in 1991: ‘If people lose the power to sack their Government, one of several things happens. First, people may just slope off. Apathy could destroy democracy. When the turnout drops below 50 per cent., we are in danger.’

The danger is that the very basis of the Prime Minister’s right to rule comes into question when his support among the people is so slender and his opposition there so great and growing. Starmer’s rapprochement with the European Union in particular runs against our clearly expressed wish - no, our instruction, since the main Parties’ undertaking to carry out the result of the 2016 Referendum turned it into a plebiscite. Our claim to be a democracy is being tested. Where on the line from absolute monarchical rule (albeit delegated to the First Minister) to full republic do we sit?

What may we do when our representatives cease to represent us? In 1774 Edmund Burke told his Bristol electors that his duty was not to follow their opinion but to exercise his judgment in their interest; now, it seems our MPs have done neither. How was it in our interest to lose our sovereignty? Whose right was it to decide that?

We owe a debt of thanks to Andrew Neather, a former speechwriter for Mr Blair. In a 2009 article in the London Evening Standard he said that New Labour’s immigration policy was (in his estimation) partly intended ‘to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.’ 

Naturally many people have been tempted to shoot the messenger but his honesty is greatly to be valued, since it revealed the near-insane mindset of Westminster politics, each side determined to give the other ‘one in the eye’ and a fig for the interests of the general populace. 

Even worse than the money-grubbing of the Right was their decision to adopt some of New Labour’s policies in the hope of winning a long term in office like Blair’s. LOTO David Cameron joined the unParliamentary applause (see 35:00 on) as ‘Tony’ swanned off to greater things; may we have an honour roll of those who sat on their hands?

Does anybody wonder at the rise of Reform?

Well, to our muttons.

The PM opened by announcing the report of the Strategic Defence Review. No-one was so discourteous as to take him to task for informing Parliament after the Press and other interested parties; but then, the Conservatives had been scolded in the past by Speaker Bercow for similar offences.

LibDem leader Ed Davey’s manners were not quite so polished as his shoes when he repeatedly spoke of ‘Trump’, only once mentioning that man’s office. ‘I had hoped the Prime Minister would now be beginning to see the sort of man Trump is and start getting tough on him,’ said Mr Davey, channelling ‘The Mouse That Roared.’

He went on to speak of aid to Gaza and the role of the United Nations (whose Presidency will soon pass to Ukraine-supporting ‘no matter what my German voters think’ Annalena Baerbock.)

Claire Hanna of the SDLP bandied the term ‘genocide’ and called for recognition of the state of Palestine; both terms lacking definition here. The SNP’s Brendan O’Hara challenged Starmer to stand by the latter’s legal claim that ‘no genocide has occurred or is occurring’ in Gaza; Sir Keir deplored recent actions but reiterated his position that there should be a ceasefire and that Israeli hostages should be released. The pressure mounts; the skilful PR work of Hamas in using their civilians as human shields may yet succeed in defeating and ultimately destroying Israel, despite the PM’s hopes for a two-state solution. In the context of ‘global instability’ (of which this is a part) Starmer reminded Mr O’Hara of the SNP’s opposition to our nuclear deterrent.

The SNP got another blow from Sir Keir in response to Graeme Downie (Labour, Dunfermline and Dollar) who asked about price inflation in Scotland and restricted employment opportunities for young people. The PM made great play of the SNP’s budgetary difficulties and their sad consequences. Dr Scott Arthur (Labour, Edinburgh South West) supplied him with more ammunition in the form of cutbacks in Scottish adult mental health services. Useful whipping-boys, the SNP.

Also on health, when Manuela Perteghella (Con) asked for a reconsideration of the NIC hike hitting care providers Starmer ‘gently’ (a bully signal) told her that her Party had opposed the Budget.

Lincoln Jopp (Con) tried twitting Sir Keir with Mrs Thatcher’s observation that ‘the trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.’ The PM hit back with a snide reference to former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng, whom Jopp had replaced at the General Election; and to Reform’s ‘unfunded commitments’; and to ‘Liz Truss 2.0.’ There, that bruised several bystanders in his game of Blind-Man’s-Buff!

One whom the PM could not so blithely dismiss was David Davis (Con), who raised the issue of most exonerees not receiving compensation for wrongful imprisonment. But then, Mr Davis had craftily prefaced his query with a reminder that Starmer himself had published a book on ‘Miscarriages of Justice’ in 1999. The PM said he would ‘take away what he says and have it looked at.’ More stiletto questions like that, please.

Friday, June 06, 2025

FRIDAY MUSIC: Cesária Evora, by JD

I’m not sure how well known she is in this country but judging by the number of views registered on YouTube the rest of the world seems to love her music.

Cesária Evora (27 August 1941 – 17 December 2011)

"Cesária Evora was a Cape Verdean singer who was known for her rich, haunting voice.

“She became known for singing mornas, traditional Cape Verdean folk songs that were sorrowful emotion-charged chronicles of the country’s long and bitter history of isolation, slave trade, and population loss due to emigration. She also sang coladeras—mornas with a faster tempo. Although her music earned her a multitude of fans on the islands of Cape Verde, it did not provide financial success.

“The positive response generated by the 1992 release of Miss perfumado earned her widespread popularity in Europe and led to an international tour. During the 1990s and early 2000s, Evora continued to record new albums and perform around the world. She won a 2003 Grammy Award for her album Voz d’amor. Her final album, Cesaria Evora &… (2010), was a collection of duets assembled through collaboration with musicians from more than 15 countries."

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Cesaria-Evora
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ces%C3%A1ria_%C3%89vora

Cesária Evora - Mar Azul (Official Video)
Cesária Evora - Petit pays (Official Video)
Tiempo y Silencio
Cesária Evora - Sangue de Beirona (Official Video)
CESARIA EVORA - Sodade. Live In Paris at Le Grand Rex, April 2004.
Cesária Evora - Angola (Official Video)

Sunday, June 01, 2025

Sunday Sipping: A Matter of Taste, by Wiggia

I haven’t commented on here very often in the last three years, for a variety of reasons, one being health. A brief summary follows, I have written in detail about my experiences within the NHS organisation, the good the bad and the ugly-plus an extra ingredient I won/t elaborate on again just about covers it.

Three years ago I collapsed and woke up six weeks later having undergone two brain operations within 24 hours and a serious bowel operation a week later. Fortunately I was sedated during my time at Addenbrokes Hospital in Cambridge so knew nothing about what had happened and the subsequent procedures. I was then transferred back to the Norfolk and Norwich where I eventually started to recover, after catching Covid and contracting a bowel infection that was supposed to finish me, a change of doctor (long story) and a change in medication and treatment.

The reason I mention all this was that what happened to me and what happens to other people if brain surgery is involved: one suffers a change or loss, temporary or otherwise of faculties, memory, smell, taste.

At the time wine was not on the list of things I should be worrying about, far from it. Various tests and exercises brought about improvements in memory function, at first even my birthday was beyond recall and constant illusions muddied the progress, seeing the four horsemen of the apocalypse at the bottom of one’s bed as I did earlier is not to be recommended when you are trying to be positive!

After rehab home at last and the question of food that I could eat and the thorny question of what I could drink came to the forefront. The food was relatively easy: no spicy items, very little green stuff and a lot of trial and error was involved.

Now to the drinking. I was told no problem with wine in strict moderation, so I started to sample and the fun started.

At first red wine caused problems so was cut out completely, later to be reintroduced a little at a time, so white wine was my staple, again in moderation.

All my long held preconceptions went out of the window. Some had no smell, some had no taste, those that did have one or both had changed completely from my inbuilt conception as to what they should taste or smell like. In many cases the taste or smell was amplified way beyond that which my memory could remember, particularly fruity reds such as certain Rhone varieties with matching sometimes glorious over-the-top aromas.

As for my extensive Riesling collection many, but not all of the trocken/dry wines became dull and lifeless and it became a case of suck it and see.

Two things came out of this for me.

Firstly there was a period of seeing where all this was going, i.e. would my tastes get back to something like the previous normal? They did with most foods, and did settle with wine, but not as before, so after much consideration I made the decision to sell all that which was obviously out of kilter with my new tastes. So out went what was left of my Bordeaux - I had previously offloaded nearly all my stored ‘en primeur’ of the region anyway, Chianti tasted like battery acid and Barolo was not far behind. The list is too long to expand on here but you get the picture. In whites many became just dull; for Riesling spätlese seems to be the sweet spot, no pun intended, and buttery Chardonnays over the leaner versions; acidity over other components is now a no-go area, though not totally.

The second part is interesting in that it assumes there is a right and wrong appreciation of wine virtues/values, but if I had been born with the appreciation of wine I have now my outlook and taste would be totally different from that which has guided me for the last fifty years. No longer can I say that such and such lacks x because now it doesn’t. Is it a dilemma? No, it is simply another’s view of the same product; in some ways I have been lucky to have two bites of the same cherry.

This is no different to the way the brain interprets sound and vision. Illusions cause the brain to come to different conclusions. It all brings the tasting both amateur and professional into focus, it matters not a jot what someone else says about a wine food music etc, it is what gives you pleasure at any given moment.

To finish a short story, my oldest fiend died of dementia recently in Adelaide, Australia. We had known each since we were five years old so a long relationship. In ‘95 my wife and I managed to get three months of holiday during the winter and went on a world wide trip including six weeks plus in Australia and stayed with my friend for three weeks+ in Adelaide.

He was not into wine other than drinking it! but we stayed in the Barrosa for some days and visited some forty wineries in the Barossa and sub regions…

Back home the following Christmas a case of wine arrived from my friend from Aus. He knew little of wine but a friend of of his did so it was selected by the friend on his behalf. It seemed a good idea at the time if this was to be made an annual event, so a sum was agreed which I sent him and some suggestions for the case; wines unavailable here in the UK, would be included.

This worked well for years but recently as the dementia took hold he started to make mistakes and the last case before I stopped the exercise showed why. Virtually the whole sum allocated was spent on one bottle, I had to make good the shortfall.

The bottle as below:
Out of curiosity I looked up to see if this was available in the UK, and B&B have it at around £350 a bottle. I would never pay that for any wine, though in the past I pushed the boat out before wine prices hit the stratosphere.

Was it any good? A lot of hype surrounds it. In my current phase of appreciation the nose was phenomenal, a glorious sniffer; in the mouth for me it was a tier class Bordeaux so probably not the best person to judge that aspect now, or maybe I am?

And yes, it is a screw top.

Anyway a glass was raised to my old friend.

And a glass was raised to my consultant who explained it all to me.

Friday, May 30, 2025

FRIDAY MUSIC: Tim Buckley, by JD

"Very few people have any idea of Tim Buckley other than as Jeff Buckley's father, or maybe as a folkie from the late sixties. Those labels hardly begin to scratch the surface of his musical genius, as uncommercial as it may have been at the time. But few who have looked at his full career can deny that he had a talent like few others, and a voice that, I believe, is still unmatched.

"Tim Buckley (February 14, 1947 – June 29, 1975) was an American singer/songwriter. He began his career based in folk rock, but subsequently experimented with genres such as psychedelia, jazz, the avant-garde, and funk paired with his unique five-octave vocal range.

"Buckley died at the age of 28 from a heroin and morphine overdose. He left behind one biological son, Jeff, who himself was a highly regarded singer who died young, as well as an adopted son, Taylor."

https://audiography.livejournal.com/531395.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Buckley

Tim Buckley - Song to the Siren
Tim Buckley • “Happy Time/Sing A Song For You” • 1968 [Reelin' In The Years Archive]
Tim Buckley - Dolphins - Whistle Test (May '74)
Tim Buckley - Wings
Tim Buckley - Once I Was

Sunday, May 25, 2025

Yes or no? PMQs 21st May 2025

Overture

Seemingly, the PM aims to make PMQs into a tired, pointless country dance. It’s all about managing appearances, which is easy when almost everything is scripted and minor characters are never allowed supplementary questions to smash through his meringue answers.

Even with the greater latitude afforded to the Leader of the Opposition, Kemi Badenoch rarely scores, either. Last week she did, claiming that unemployment had risen ten per cent since Starmer took over. This galvanised the Government into a response and, since Sir Keir was not sufficiently on top of his brief to shoot her down straight away, it was left to Jake Richards (Lab, Rother Valley) to raise it straight after the session as a Point Of Order. Here is his POO, delivered with something of our Leader’s boorish snarl:

“That figure is completely and utterly incorrect. It is no wonder that George Osborne, the former Conservative Chancellor, has said that she has no economic plan if she cannot even get basic statistics right. Will the Leader of the Opposition return to the House and correct the record?”

The Speaker set him down gently: “You have corrected the record in your opinion. We will leave it there for now.”

Act One

This week, the PM began with a couple of sad items – is being a ‘mood hoover’ his technique to dull blades before they clash? – and went on to boast of his ‘deals’. One of these last was with the EU and included an astounding giveaway, extending for another twelve years the Union’s fishing rights under the Brexit withdrawal agreement that were due to expire in June 2026.

When Edward Heath allowed Continental ships the liberty to fish right up to our shoreline as part of our 1973 entry into the EEC, it was because of blithering incompetence, and so his government blew PR smoke all over it.

This PM has no such excuse, if that’s the word we seek. The despair so many of us feel is because we cannot always tell whether the Starmer Government knows what it is doing or not, and which is worse. In this case, it is the former.

Does the PM actually ‘have it in’ for fishermen and farmers? If so, would that be because those food producers are not ‘working people’ as defined by Sir Keir? They work longer than most and often earn less, but they are not wage slaves – is that the problem?

Starmer’s other ‘deals’ were with the US and India, and they too hardly bear critical examination. If you sent the PM out to get fish and chips, what on earth might he come back with?

As for his vaunted “fastest economic growth in the G7”, if we take in the world and his wife, GDP will go through the roof, and at the same time we will be bust.

The first question was from Lewis Cocking (Con), who asked when Starmer would “stop all illegal immigration”. This received the customary bureaucratic boilerplate: past Tory failures / government introducing legislation / Opposition voting against (skipping over the valid reasons). It was a very weak attack anyway – illegal immigration is only a fraction of the overall influx, and if the ‘youth worker visa’ system takes off, the traffickers may find a way to document their customers appropriately.

Next was Labour’s Sarah Owen, highlighting the plight of pensioners forced by inflation to use up their savings. Yet even the mightiest oak will bend in a strong wind, and the PM said: “We want to ensure that more pensioners are eligible for winter fuel payments as we go forward.” Everything depended on the economic improvements he foresaw.

Then came the main feature: a spat between Starmer and Badenoch on inflation, the causes of which are complex, not least ‘events, dear boy’. Kemi bore the usual tirade with equanimity but though she has the hide of a rhinoceros, she lacks its horn. She failed to puncture Starmer with her demand for a yes-or-no on whether he was planning a U-turn on the Winter Fuel Allowance; but then, he had just given his more nuanced response to Sarah Owen.

Interval

During these exchanges, the Speaker had to intervene to chide the Government benches for their noisy mockery, both Whips and “Boyzone at the back”. Such is the arrogant self-confidence of overwhelming power. A propos, post-PMQs, in a Point Of Order raised by Kirsty Blackman (SNP), Speaker Hoyle had to deliver a rocket to DWP and Treasury officials who were failing to respond in a timely fashion to her constituent.

Wera Hobhouse (Lib Dem) told of China’s refusal to admit her into Hong Kong, because of her stance on human rights as she suspected. The PM deplored banning people “for simply expressing their views”. He also assured John McDonnell (Ind) that he would continue to press the Egyptian Government for the release of long-imprisoned British-Egyptian human rights campaigner Alaa Abd el-Fattah.

However, Sir Keir’s sympathies were more limited towards Lucy Connolly, who is part way through a 31-month sentence for an intemperate tweet that she had deleted within a few hours. He told Rupert Lowe (Ind) that he celebrated the independence of British courts and was “strongly in favour” of free speech (a tradition of which he boasted to US President Trump) but was “against incitement to violence”. Some might say the jury is out in that case, in the ‘court of public opinion’.

Act Two

After ‘PM v LOTO’, Louise Jones (Labour) soothed Starmer’s unruffled feathers with a gift question on breakfast clubs and other measures to give children a better start in life.

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey asked yet again, somewhat pointlessly, about the Winter Fuel Allowance, but more penetratingly about changes to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP). The constituent’s case Davey quoted meant potentially an income cut of £12,000 a year. To the latter, Sir Keir gave his off-the-peg generalised response about necessary support, plus help to get work. Later, Labour’s Andy MacNae raised the same issue, specifically in relation to stressful multiple PIP reassessments; again, the PM spoke of the need to reform the system.

Jim Allister (TUV, North Antrim) highlighted another unresolved problem – that of Northern Ireland and its post-Brexit trading status with the EU, whereby British Steel could sell to the US free of tariffs, but not to NI. The PM acknowledged that it was a work in progress.

Alistair Carmichael (Lib Dem) reiterated the issue of family farm IHT. To skeptical noises, Starmer asserted the “very limited impact of the inheritance tax, only on farmers at a very high level”.

Dr Neil Hudson (Con) tried a portmanteau question on winter fuel payments, pensioner poverty, the “jobs tax”, family farm IHT and fishing rights. This was a mistake, as Sir Keir often gives vague answers even to focused queries; his reply was about our high growth (unanalysed) and trade deals (ditto).

Similarly, Lee Anderson (Reform) wanted to know exactly how many of Starmer’s 24,000 deportees were illegals who arrived by boat or were smuggled in by lorries. Sir Keir’s response to the “simple question” was to boast of the numbers and to criticise the Opposition for not supporting his Immigration Bill (again, without saying what their reasons may have been).

It might have been better to send this for a written reply and then castigate officials if they failed to be specific. All it did this time was give the PM the opportunity to note Nigel Farage’s absence from the Chamber.

A deadlier yes-or-no question might have been the one that ex-MP George Galloway suggests (see from 2:00 on), as to whether Starmer has ever met any of the three young men accused of setting fire to his current and former properties; but nobody would have the nerve. Besides, rumour has it that the whole affair has been overblown; by whom, and why, is not clear.

On an ostensibly unrelated matter, Winston Churchill is said to have been the last red-headed Prime Minister (though grey when in office).