We are into that time of year which used to be known as the 'silly season' which coincides with school and Parliament holidays and the newspapers are filled with trivial or inconsequential stories. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silly_season Times have changed somewhat and it sometimes feels as though the silly season lasts all year round!
But to maintain the 'tradition' here is a potpourri of musical strangeness. (- in keeping with this year's strange weather.)
br />
Sackerson adds:
From the sublime to... here is a favourite of mine -
UPDATE
JD tells me some swine actually did this for real:
http://mentalfloss.com/article/50986/terrifying-katzenklavier-organ-made-cats
Friday, August 16, 2019
Wednesday, August 14, 2019
1978 - when TV political debate was more serious
Here is the Thames TV debate on the Common Market and its relevance to the minority Callaghan government. If only modern debate could be more like this.
Dennis Skinner is very good on the multiple impacts on British industry and labour.
I like the comment by John Pardoe (Liberal) towards the end of Part 2 when he talks about the disadvantages of government by a party that has secured an overwhelming majority in Parliament.
I think that EU membership and recent British government have highlighted the need to revisit:
Dennis Skinner is very good on the multiple impacts on British industry and labour.
I like the comment by John Pardoe (Liberal) towards the end of Part 2 when he talks about the disadvantages of government by a party that has secured an overwhelming majority in Parliament.
I think that EU membership and recent British government have highlighted the need to revisit:
- The increasing power of the Executive
- The use of prerogative powers
- The expansion of secondary legislation that is merely waved through both Houses
Sunday, August 11, 2019
Epstein: a prediction
I have read that Jeffrey Epstein used to document everything about his activities and clients, presumably as a form of insurance. Now that he is dead - rather mysteriously - his properties can be searched without hindrance.
I predict that nothing will be found that would prove any of the allegations or rumours made against some of the rich, powerful and famous people with whom he had been associated. Not at his homes, offices or lodged with his lawyers past and present.
For I'm confident that America is just as good at losing information as we are.
You may remember that in 1984 Conservative MP for Huddersfield, Geoffrey Dickens passed a file about paedophiles and child pornography to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan. Dickens had been campaigning on this issue for some years and had even used Parliamentary privilege to name a former British High Commissioner. He claimed there was a paedophile network involving "big, big names – people in positions of power, influence and responsibility" and threatened to name them in the Commons also.
Brittan had told Dickens that the file would be passed to the police; Scotland Yard later said that they had no record of any such investigation. And in the same week that the dossier was given to Brittan, both Dickens' London flat and consituency home were broken into and ransacked - without any ordinary valuables being taken.
Also in the 1980s, it is said that former Labour Cabinet Minister and then MEP Barbara Castle gave investigative journalist Don Hale a dossier alleging the involvement of MPs and peers in the Paedophile Information Exchange. Hale was then visited by police and Special Branch and ordered to hand it over.
That file seems to have been lost, too.
Here's a challenge for a brave and tech-savvy blogger to take up: install one of those programs that identifies your readers' computer addresses and geographical locations, then run a piece titled something like "British VIP paedophile network: notarised copy of Geoffrey Dickens' 1984 file found among deceased lawyer's papers" - and see who looks in.
Or - and I guess this is best - let sleeping dogs lie. As Stalin liked to say, "A man, a problem; no man, no problem."
I predict that nothing will be found that would prove any of the allegations or rumours made against some of the rich, powerful and famous people with whom he had been associated. Not at his homes, offices or lodged with his lawyers past and present.
For I'm confident that America is just as good at losing information as we are.
You may remember that in 1984 Conservative MP for Huddersfield, Geoffrey Dickens passed a file about paedophiles and child pornography to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan. Dickens had been campaigning on this issue for some years and had even used Parliamentary privilege to name a former British High Commissioner. He claimed there was a paedophile network involving "big, big names – people in positions of power, influence and responsibility" and threatened to name them in the Commons also.
Brittan had told Dickens that the file would be passed to the police; Scotland Yard later said that they had no record of any such investigation. And in the same week that the dossier was given to Brittan, both Dickens' London flat and consituency home were broken into and ransacked - without any ordinary valuables being taken.
Also in the 1980s, it is said that former Labour Cabinet Minister and then MEP Barbara Castle gave investigative journalist Don Hale a dossier alleging the involvement of MPs and peers in the Paedophile Information Exchange. Hale was then visited by police and Special Branch and ordered to hand it over.
That file seems to have been lost, too.
Here's a challenge for a brave and tech-savvy blogger to take up: install one of those programs that identifies your readers' computer addresses and geographical locations, then run a piece titled something like "British VIP paedophile network: notarised copy of Geoffrey Dickens' 1984 file found among deceased lawyer's papers" - and see who looks in.
Or - and I guess this is best - let sleeping dogs lie. As Stalin liked to say, "A man, a problem; no man, no problem."
Friday, August 09, 2019
FRIDAY MUSIC: Ex Africam # 2, by JD
The Proms on BBC4 at the weekend featured Angélique Kidjo and I found this review from the Evening Standard:
https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/proms-2019-angelique-kidjo-review-a4202121.html
The review gives special mention to the percussionist but I thought the drummer was even better and special guest Roberto Fonseca was excellent, as usual.
Watching the show I was reminded that we need a further helping of music 'out of Africa'.
Part one was here -
https://theylaughedatnoah.blogspot.com/2017/03/friday-night-is-music-night-ex-africam.html
....and we continue, belatedly, with more of the same and it is easy to see how the Blues and the S.American rhythms were derived from Africa's musical traditions.
https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/proms-2019-angelique-kidjo-review-a4202121.html
The review gives special mention to the percussionist but I thought the drummer was even better and special guest Roberto Fonseca was excellent, as usual.
Watching the show I was reminded that we need a further helping of music 'out of Africa'.
Part one was here -
https://theylaughedatnoah.blogspot.com/2017/03/friday-night-is-music-night-ex-africam.html
....and we continue, belatedly, with more of the same and it is easy to see how the Blues and the S.American rhythms were derived from Africa's musical traditions.
Thursday, August 08, 2019
Parliament's Conundrum
Brexit: Legal bid to prevent Boris Johnson shutting down parliament
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-49251511Parliament voted to repeal ECA 1972.
Parliament voted to trigger Article 50.
Parliament rejected the dWA a record 3 times in the same session (a breach of established protocol that we can only hope will never be repeated.)
If the EU fails to offer an acceptable revised deal, how can there be anything more to say?
Tuesday, August 06, 2019
Fake News and Misleading Adjudicators
People look for quick answers, for someone to tell them whether a claim is true or false.
But the judges themselves may not always tell the full story when putting their stamp on it.
Zero Hedge, 28 December 2018: "Angela Merkel: Nation States Must "Give Up Sovereignty" To New World Order"
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-27/angela-merkel-nation-states-must-give-sovereignty-new-world-order
This is labelled "Fake News" by Maarten Schenk on leadstories.com: "Nowhere does she mention the "New World Order" and there is no place where she says "sovereign nation states must not listen to the will of their citizens when it comes to questions of immigration, borders, or even sovereignty".
https://hoax-alert.leadstories.com/3470035-fake-news-angela-merkel-nation-states-must-give-up-sovereignty-to-new-world-order.html
I reply:
"Some misquoting, perhaps - but the essential point is correct, if you read the original KAS press release (https://www.kas.de/veranstaltungsberichte/detail/-/content/-das-herz-der-demokratie-).
You will know from that, that the conference was about the tension between national sovereignty and globalisation; and that Frau Merkel is in favour of the latter, merely using parliaments as the instrument to surrender sovereignty.
This ignores the tension between parliamentary representatives and the people they claim to represent, as has been clearly instanced in the UK.
So, not quite fake news after all. Do you think you yourself have been slightly misleading here?"
Who shall guard the guardians?
But the judges themselves may not always tell the full story when putting their stamp on it.
Zero Hedge, 28 December 2018: "Angela Merkel: Nation States Must "Give Up Sovereignty" To New World Order"
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-27/angela-merkel-nation-states-must-give-sovereignty-new-world-order
This is labelled "Fake News" by Maarten Schenk on leadstories.com: "Nowhere does she mention the "New World Order" and there is no place where she says "sovereign nation states must not listen to the will of their citizens when it comes to questions of immigration, borders, or even sovereignty".
https://hoax-alert.leadstories.com/3470035-fake-news-angela-merkel-nation-states-must-give-up-sovereignty-to-new-world-order.html
I reply:
"Some misquoting, perhaps - but the essential point is correct, if you read the original KAS press release (https://www.kas.de/veranstaltungsberichte/detail/-/content/-das-herz-der-demokratie-).
You will know from that, that the conference was about the tension between national sovereignty and globalisation; and that Frau Merkel is in favour of the latter, merely using parliaments as the instrument to surrender sovereignty.
This ignores the tension between parliamentary representatives and the people they claim to represent, as has been clearly instanced in the UK.
So, not quite fake news after all. Do you think you yourself have been slightly misleading here?"
Who shall guard the guardians?
Monday, August 05, 2019
Simon Reeve on why we should have completely open borders
Hopping channels, we got a few seconds of this: "Mediterranean", with Simon Reeve.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0bqn4g1/mediterranean-with-simon-reeve-series-1-episode-4
He's just been spending a bit of time with lads on the North African coast who are trying to get into Europe illegally. And here's what he says, now on board ship and looking over the Strait of Gibraltar at 17:30 minutes in:
"Across the Mediterranean, from Africa to Europe, from Morocco to Spain, it feels that under the watchful eye of those lads in the forest who look at these big ships carrying their hopes and their dreams across to southern Spain. And I just get to do it thanks to this (gets out his passport) little thing: my passport (chagrined grimace); an accident of birth."
Yes, indeed. It's hard not to feel sympathy with people who want a better life.
But if you're going to play on our emotions in this way, there should also be a cool head to go with that warm heart.
There are three options:
a.) Let anyone and everyone into Europe, anytime.
b.) Let nobody in, ever.
c.) Let some people in.
Since (a) and (b) are obviously lunatic, it must be (c). And if (c), then we need a system.
It really doesn't help the political discourse to have TV presenters and celebs indulge in obiter dicta without considering the implications of what they say.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0bqn4g1/mediterranean-with-simon-reeve-series-1-episode-4
He's just been spending a bit of time with lads on the North African coast who are trying to get into Europe illegally. And here's what he says, now on board ship and looking over the Strait of Gibraltar at 17:30 minutes in:
"Across the Mediterranean, from Africa to Europe, from Morocco to Spain, it feels that under the watchful eye of those lads in the forest who look at these big ships carrying their hopes and their dreams across to southern Spain. And I just get to do it thanks to this (gets out his passport) little thing: my passport (chagrined grimace); an accident of birth."
Yes, indeed. It's hard not to feel sympathy with people who want a better life.
But if you're going to play on our emotions in this way, there should also be a cool head to go with that warm heart.
There are three options:
a.) Let anyone and everyone into Europe, anytime.
b.) Let nobody in, ever.
c.) Let some people in.
Since (a) and (b) are obviously lunatic, it must be (c). And if (c), then we need a system.
It really doesn't help the political discourse to have TV presenters and celebs indulge in obiter dicta without considering the implications of what they say.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)