Monday, November 22, 2010
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Is there a science of flavour combining?
You're probably familiar with versions of the colour wheel, first attempted by Sir Isaac Newton in 1666 (left) and since reworked in different ways (example, above).
But can the same be done for food and drink? One thinks of chef Heston Blumenthal's bizarre combinations - snail porridge, bacon and egg ice cream, etc - and wonders whether there is some underlying set of principles.
This seems to be far more difficult, because individual foods are a complex of flavour elements and besides, texture and appearance are important additional factors. Also, all these aspects can change as a result of how they are prepared and cooked. And there are hundreds of ingredients, subdivided into many varieties, so there is a dauntingly large number of potential combinations.
A recent book byNiki Segnit, "The Flavour Thesaurus", attempts a schema of selected foods - see page 8.
But you may find this website useful in your experiments - it allows you to input an ingredient and find a choice of partners for it.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Blowing a stolen trumpet
As others have noted, blogging appears to be undergoing a recession (rage is so tiring); so I am thankful for any scraps of recognition or praise. Perhaps we should look for quality of readership, rather than quantity.
I am ego-boosted by my ranking as 6th/49 in Online MBA's list of "Top 49 Economic Blogs with Visual Aids", and the inclusion of Bearwatch on Alltop's live post-listing of "Top Economics News". We humbly rub shoulders there with some of the real big hitters, and are grateful that nobody's noticed our scuffed shoes.
When I finally suspect I'm an authority, I shall let you know. Until then, I shall continue to stand on the shoulders of giants, and pick their pockets.
I am ego-boosted by my ranking as 6th/49 in Online MBA's list of "Top 49 Economic Blogs with Visual Aids", and the inclusion of Bearwatch on Alltop's live post-listing of "Top Economics News". We humbly rub shoulders there with some of the real big hitters, and are grateful that nobody's noticed our scuffed shoes.
When I finally suspect I'm an authority, I shall let you know. Until then, I shall continue to stand on the shoulders of giants, and pick their pockets.
Inflation vs deflation revisited
I am flattered to receive attention from the Economic Policy Journal re my recent post on the Weimar hyperinflation of 1923. (I should have made it clearer that the graph is not mine - it comes from the site I linked to in that post, i.e. Now and Futures. Apologies for any misunderstanding, which I didn't intend.)
Some may think that I'm scaremongering, talking about such a scale of inflation; and we must hope that it doesn't come to pass. After all, history cannot be repeated exactly because the later time has the memory of the earlier, a point made elegantly by Jorge Luis Borges' short story "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote". But we may simply get to the same destination more slowly - after all, the dollar and pound have lost something like 98% of their value since the beginning of the 20th century.
So I responded to the comments as follows:
You're right, we're in a deflation at the moment, but the undermining of the currency is already showing up as inflation in energy and food prices. Recently (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2-BZEyOnhE) Mike Shedlock and Dr Marc Faber appeared together on an interview and they agreed that inflation was the end stage, the only real difference of opinion between them was over timing.
Deflation would greatly benefit holders of cash (and gold, which seems to be a great each way bet if you buy in at the right price), but pretty much cripple and bust everyone else, so you're right again. Which is why our governments are so very motivated to find a way to restimulate inflation.
This time, the most indebted countries seem to be competing to see who inflates most (so they end up debauching their currencies in parallel), and the creditors who depend on exporting to them are trying to follow suit. The global economy has never been so interconnected before so we're in new teritory.
Faber reckons we are heading for a global bust; in which case I suppose global trade will break down, the focus will be on national and individual self-sufficiency and those who have spare assets will hold commodities of one sort or another until a new, sound currency arises.
Scaremongering? My mother's family lived through the Weimar inflation, but got through OK because they were farmers; until the busted German middle class turned to a new leader. The farm is now in Russian-held territory and we haven't seen it since 1945.
I have hope for the USA because it has natural resources (including land) that could satisfy the reasonable needs of the population; and because you have a Constitution that could be your storm cellar, if you don't let your corrupted elite persuade you to fill it in and build over it.
Some may think that I'm scaremongering, talking about such a scale of inflation; and we must hope that it doesn't come to pass. After all, history cannot be repeated exactly because the later time has the memory of the earlier, a point made elegantly by Jorge Luis Borges' short story "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote". But we may simply get to the same destination more slowly - after all, the dollar and pound have lost something like 98% of their value since the beginning of the 20th century.
So I responded to the comments as follows:
You're right, we're in a deflation at the moment, but the undermining of the currency is already showing up as inflation in energy and food prices. Recently (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2-BZEyOnhE) Mike Shedlock and Dr Marc Faber appeared together on an interview and they agreed that inflation was the end stage, the only real difference of opinion between them was over timing.
Deflation would greatly benefit holders of cash (and gold, which seems to be a great each way bet if you buy in at the right price), but pretty much cripple and bust everyone else, so you're right again. Which is why our governments are so very motivated to find a way to restimulate inflation.
This time, the most indebted countries seem to be competing to see who inflates most (so they end up debauching their currencies in parallel), and the creditors who depend on exporting to them are trying to follow suit. The global economy has never been so interconnected before so we're in new teritory.
Faber reckons we are heading for a global bust; in which case I suppose global trade will break down, the focus will be on national and individual self-sufficiency and those who have spare assets will hold commodities of one sort or another until a new, sound currency arises.
Scaremongering? My mother's family lived through the Weimar inflation, but got through OK because they were farmers; until the busted German middle class turned to a new leader. The farm is now in Russian-held territory and we haven't seen it since 1945.
I have hope for the USA because it has natural resources (including land) that could satisfy the reasonable needs of the population; and because you have a Constitution that could be your storm cellar, if you don't let your corrupted elite persuade you to fill it in and build over it.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
The State of the Union, in credit terms
First published on The Broad Oak Blog (Nov. 15, 2010):
________________________________________
CMA DataVision's third-quarter report gives the latest assessments of sovereign debt default risk, as measured by the price of credit default insurance. This edition also includes ratings for selected individual States of the USA. I have combined the latter with the former in a ranking below, so that you can see the ratings of States in some sort of context. Please click on the picture to enlarge.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog.
________________________________________
CMA DataVision's third-quarter report gives the latest assessments of sovereign debt default risk, as measured by the price of credit default insurance. This edition also includes ratings for selected individual States of the USA. I have combined the latter with the former in a ranking below, so that you can see the ratings of States in some sort of context. Please click on the picture to enlarge.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog.
Sovereign debt default risk
First published on The Broad Oak Blog (Nov. 15, 2010):
___________________________________________
On October 7, CMA DataVision released their third-quarter report on the credit ratings of sovereign countries. CMA's ratings are worked out by looking at what the credit market charges for insuring against default. This market-based marking is different from the assessments of Standard and Poor's, Moody's, Fitch etc, who are paid by the organisations they rate and whose reputation has been brought into question after the events of 2008.
On page 4, CMA says that four of the 10 most risky nations are in the EU (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Romania). It's worth remembering that a fifth on that list, Ukraine, is eager to join the EU. (For those who want to know about all the "PIGS", Spain is 21st most risky.) How is the currency and banking of the European Union meant to contain these problems?
The UK is rated 59th most risky (or 13th safest), with an implied credit rating of aa+ (as opposed to the official AAA rating that has helped to keep down the cost of our credit).
Four Nordic countries lead the list of securest debt: Norway, Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Only four other countries share their "implied AAA" rating: Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Australia.
The United States has been downgraded this quarter, from "aaa" to "aa+" - the same as for the United Kingdom.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog.
___________________________________________
On October 7, CMA DataVision released their third-quarter report on the credit ratings of sovereign countries. CMA's ratings are worked out by looking at what the credit market charges for insuring against default. This market-based marking is different from the assessments of Standard and Poor's, Moody's, Fitch etc, who are paid by the organisations they rate and whose reputation has been brought into question after the events of 2008.
On page 4, CMA says that four of the 10 most risky nations are in the EU (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Romania). It's worth remembering that a fifth on that list, Ukraine, is eager to join the EU. (For those who want to know about all the "PIGS", Spain is 21st most risky.) How is the currency and banking of the European Union meant to contain these problems?
The UK is rated 59th most risky (or 13th safest), with an implied credit rating of aa+ (as opposed to the official AAA rating that has helped to keep down the cost of our credit).
Four Nordic countries lead the list of securest debt: Norway, Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Only four other countries share their "implied AAA" rating: Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Australia.
The United States has been downgraded this quarter, from "aaa" to "aa+" - the same as for the United Kingdom.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog.
Gold is merely the thermometer of inflation?
First published on The Broad Oak Blog (Oct. 9, 2010):
________________________________
The vitally important inflation / deflation debate continues. In my last post, I relayed one view, which is that the very rich and powerful will not permit runaway inflation, because it erodes the value of money and the rich have most of the money.
As a corrective, I give below the latest video from the National Inflation Association (NIA), a US group that has warned about credit growth and inflation for a long time. Their motivation appears to be patriotic - a return to sound money as part of what makes individual prosperity and freedom possible.
The NIA argues that the rise in the price of gold is not because of mass speculation, for although a lot of gold has been bought recently, a lot has also been sold. What may be happening now is a transfer of privately-held gold from relatively poor people who need to raise money, to investors who are looking ahead to a time when cash will rapidly depreciate. Think of all those gold-buying outlets (or inlets) you now see on your High Street. As someone said a while ago, the mania will be when those shops start selling you gold instead of buying it from you.
As many have now said, trading nations around the world are devaluing their currencies to keep pace with one another, for fear that their exports will be hit if they don't. So the soaring value of precious metals can be seen as a better indication of inflation than currency exchange rates.
You may think that if currencies are depreciating, then surely prices of goods and services in general must also increase rapidly, and we don't see this yet. But we are in a recession and the threat of unemployment is keeping down wage demands; the self-employed are willing to lower their rates, perhaps especially if paid in cash; and traders in items such as cars and computers are offering discounts to clear stock and keep paying their overheads.
However, the NIA and others say there will come a time when the system begins to crack. Governments are buying their own debt, or lending money to banks to do it for them, to maintain the appearance of normality and control; this can't go on forever. The prediction is that we will get either default or hyperinflation. So the gold bugs say buy gold, silver, maybe oil and agricultural commodities etc - anything tangible that can't be multiplied at will.
I don't think (feel) that the turning point is imminent, because of recession and the attempts by some governments (such as the UK) to retrench. But I fear that these last-ditch attempts are untimately doomed to partial or complete failure. In that case, the gold bugs will probably be vindicated.
The other thing I'd say, as I've said before, is that if the system really does come under severe strain, the price of gold may not be the most important of your concerns. If you accept the inflationists' thesis, you will be quietly making preparations to cope with emergencies of different kinds.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog.
________________________________
The vitally important inflation / deflation debate continues. In my last post, I relayed one view, which is that the very rich and powerful will not permit runaway inflation, because it erodes the value of money and the rich have most of the money.
As a corrective, I give below the latest video from the National Inflation Association (NIA), a US group that has warned about credit growth and inflation for a long time. Their motivation appears to be patriotic - a return to sound money as part of what makes individual prosperity and freedom possible.
The NIA argues that the rise in the price of gold is not because of mass speculation, for although a lot of gold has been bought recently, a lot has also been sold. What may be happening now is a transfer of privately-held gold from relatively poor people who need to raise money, to investors who are looking ahead to a time when cash will rapidly depreciate. Think of all those gold-buying outlets (or inlets) you now see on your High Street. As someone said a while ago, the mania will be when those shops start selling you gold instead of buying it from you.
As many have now said, trading nations around the world are devaluing their currencies to keep pace with one another, for fear that their exports will be hit if they don't. So the soaring value of precious metals can be seen as a better indication of inflation than currency exchange rates.
You may think that if currencies are depreciating, then surely prices of goods and services in general must also increase rapidly, and we don't see this yet. But we are in a recession and the threat of unemployment is keeping down wage demands; the self-employed are willing to lower their rates, perhaps especially if paid in cash; and traders in items such as cars and computers are offering discounts to clear stock and keep paying their overheads.
However, the NIA and others say there will come a time when the system begins to crack. Governments are buying their own debt, or lending money to banks to do it for them, to maintain the appearance of normality and control; this can't go on forever. The prediction is that we will get either default or hyperinflation. So the gold bugs say buy gold, silver, maybe oil and agricultural commodities etc - anything tangible that can't be multiplied at will.
I don't think (feel) that the turning point is imminent, because of recession and the attempts by some governments (such as the UK) to retrench. But I fear that these last-ditch attempts are untimately doomed to partial or complete failure. In that case, the gold bugs will probably be vindicated.
The other thing I'd say, as I've said before, is that if the system really does come under severe strain, the price of gold may not be the most important of your concerns. If you accept the inflationists' thesis, you will be quietly making preparations to cope with emergencies of different kinds.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)