EU debate with Nick Clegg: suggestions
Please
accept my congratulations on your accepting Nick Clegg’s challenge – one that,
I hope, he will have good reason to regret having made. May I offer some points to raise in the
debate?
Not “why should we leave?” but “why should
we join?”: Some argue – and I think
they’re right – that the English Constitution cannot be altered without the
express consent of all parties, including the Commons speaking for themselves, not through elected representatives. If
that is so, then all acts to date of the British Government and Parliament
implying surrender of sovereignty in any degree, are ultra vires. Why not offer
Clegg that as a hypothetical starting point, and ask what reasons he could give
for us to surrender our sovereignty to the EU? This shifts the onus to him.
College of Europe: What exactly did
Clegg learn in his year there, and did he make any oaths or give any
undertakings that might conflict with his duty as a British MP and Minister?
UK Parliament: continuing the conflict
of interest theme, should all in either House who have been EU Commissioners or
otherwise stand to lose their EU pension and privileges if they fail to
represent a pro-EU point of view, not merely declare their interest but recuse
themselves from voting or taking part in any debate that has an EU dimension?
Yours sincerely
READER: PLEASE CLICK THE REACTION BELOW - THANKS!
Yours sincerely
READER: PLEASE CLICK THE REACTION BELOW - THANKS!
All original material is copyright of its author. Fair use permitted. Contact via comment. Unless indicated otherwise, all internet links accessed at time of writing. Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog; or for unintentional error and inaccuracy. The blog author may have, or intend to change, a personal position in any stock or other kind of investment mentioned.
3 comments:
I like the legality aspect of your recommendations. I've seen this point on other blogs and it amazes me how little people know of our Constitution. Giving money to an organisation that hasn't conducted an audit is apparently illegal under it.
Send it to UKIP HQ.
@ James: done.
Post a Comment