Those who have read Orwell's "1984" will remember the 'memory hole' down which Winston Smith would lose historical evidence that was inconvenient to the current official narrative.
Spot the differences in this modern example:
 |
| Daily Mail online, 8 September 2013 |
 |
| Daily Mail online, 28 September 2013 |
As it happens, I am a Daily Mail reader (or skimmer), and this paper makes many people gibber (see this site); but as I said to someone who posted the latter link to his Facebook page,
"The Mail is hated by groupthinking Lefties, esp. R4 comedians who expect sycophantic laughs for their own prejudices instead of wit. It's successful because it cast its net wide - look at the funnies page (always the soul of a newspaper) to see how disparate and mutually antipathetic its subsets of readers. I read it to get the gist of the national agenda, not to share its point of view - when it has one, instead of blowing hot and cold, which is what it usually does."
Clearly even David Rose has recognised that he had blown too cool on this occasion - though retrospectively rewriting the original piece instead of issuing a correction illustrates the exuberant self-granted journalistic license that made me for a time suspect that he was really Johann Hari come in from the cold.
And now my infallible, solid-gold tip for the winner of the 3.05 pm at Ascot this afternoon: #1 - Intibaah - odds forecast 16/1. Fill yer boots! (Important note: this post updated at 19:00 on 04.10.2013).
Read The Punter's Friend every day in your soaraway Broad Oak Magazine!
All original material is copyright of its author. Fair use permitted. Contact via comment. Unless indicated otherwise, all internet links accessed at time of writing. Nothing here should be taken as personal advice, financial or otherwise. No liability is accepted for third-party content, whether incorporated in or linked to this blog; or for unintentional error and inaccuracy. The blog author may have, or intend to change, a personal position in any stock or other kind of investment mentioned.
2 comments:
So the climate is changing, man is changing it.
But what is doing it, is it industrial or agricultural behaviour and is carbon levels leading the change or following it as it did in pre-industrial climate changes?
These questions need to be answered.
Good questions. And the issue of warming vs cooling hasn't been settled, nor would the melting of the North Polar ice cap necessarily prove that the globe was warming overall.
My points here are (a) Rose's journalism on a vitally important issue is, as the vid shows, misleading and (b) the ethics of retrospectively rewriting articles are dubious.
Post a Comment