tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5524682876220396502.post8813817118781583133..comments2024-03-27T06:56:10.255+00:00Comments on Broad Oak Magazine: Professor Richard Dawkins and questionable standards of scholarshipUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5524682876220396502.post-89887115005493355942012-01-01T11:08:05.890+00:002012-01-01T11:08:05.890+00:00I'm an atheist, but have never been keen on Da...I'm an atheist, but have never been keen on Dawkins' approach. <br /><br />We should searching for philosophical and moral common ground in the face of more important and difficult challenges than Dawkins seems prepared to deal with.A K Haarthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05897490979828603179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5524682876220396502.post-50059602105709505972012-01-01T08:56:54.958+00:002012-01-01T08:56:54.958+00:00While doing so, please remember that I am talking ...While doing so, please remember that I am talking here about unscholarly argument, not the debate about the existence or non-existence of a deity. In my view, Flew nailed Dawkins.<br /><br />And I also resent a rich man using his chequebook to turn OU into a propaganda station. Someone must stand up for the humble attempt at the truth that is philosophical liberalism.Sackersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17284329249862764601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5524682876220396502.post-56714644854696423092012-01-01T00:20:27.294+00:002012-01-01T00:20:27.294+00:00I have a longer reply, but will try and make a pos...I have a longer reply, but will try and make a post of it.Paddingtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07952088638231881617noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5524682876220396502.post-73614019182419371422011-12-31T17:50:06.549+00:002011-12-31T17:50:06.549+00:00My my my!
And happy New Year, Sackers.My my my!<br /><br />And happy New Year, Sackers.James Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14525082702330365464noreply@blogger.com