The point of training is so that you do not have to be wise after the event.
It will be fifteen months before the inquest into Henry Nowak’s death is held. By that time the goldfish attention of the media will have been turned elsewhere, but when it turns back we shall be told that lessons have been learned and someone will make sure of something.
But even now it is clear some things went wrong in the police appoach to this incident. If a young man appears physically distressed and says he has been stabbed, would you check carefully rather than tell him (as recorded) “You’ve been stabbed? Whereabouts? I don’t think so, mate”?
The pathologist at the murder trial said that Nowak’s wounds were not survivable. That is a professional opinion but not the only possible one, as we shall see. Had the lad been taken to the nearby trauma department within what is known as the “golden hour” who knows?
If he could have been saved the way the police reacted may have reduced his chances. A doctor who is trained in combat medicine has seen the bodycam footage and read the autopsy report. He thinks that Nowak’s cut clavicular vein might have clotted as a natural defence but the rough handling and the process of handcuffing could have reopened the wound and that may be why the victim then bled out and lost consciousness three minutes later.
If paramedics had arrived first on the scene, Henry’s chances of survival would have been as high as 50%, says Dr Magier according to “Basil the Great.”
Were these police officers not trained in dealing with stabbing injuries? There are around 50.000 such incidents annually in England and Wales and we now often see a “bleed control kit” next to a defibrillator in public places. Or is it that anti-racism training biased the officers to make a fatal assumption, bearing in mind that the killer’s brother called the police to say it was a racist attack by Nowak and that no weapons had been involved?
The possibility of prevention goes back further. There were signs that if correctly read should have flagged Vickrum Digwa for monitoring - in fact his father and brother too. The family had collected an array of weapons and brother Gurpreet brandished a sword in a different road rage incident. The killer was already known to police, had stolen weapons from a gurdwara (Sikh temple) whose leaders described him as “argumentative with the congregation and confrontational.”
Perhaps there should be less reporting of infants to Prevent for potentially racist comments and more careful noting of genuine danger signals. Perhaps old-fashioned beat policing would have been able to use the local community knowledge and judgment of officers instead of the current reactive system that uses them as the bin men of crime, cleaning up after the event has happened.
And perhaps we should then not have a febrile people lashing out around them because of systemic governmental failure to protect us. We should not have to see political speakers in a wild bidding war to see how many first and second generation immigrants should be deported.
Rather than the divisive and inflammatory “two-tier” policing and justice (denied to be such by the present PM) we might benefit from a return to the pre-2002 attestation for constables. The wording used to be:
I, [name] of [place], do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve Our Sovereign Lady the Queen in the office of constable, without favour or affection, malice or ill will; and that I will to the best of my power cause the peace to be kept and preserved, and prevent all offences against the persons and properties of Her Majesty’s subjects; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.
Back on the beat!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unfortunately, because of a plague of spam comments, you need to be a "registered user", otherwise your observations will be buried in a torrent of multilingual nonsense. Please do comment!
Say what you please, so long as it's phrased politely and is not libellous or legally proscribed. Fact, reason and wit are keenly welcomed.