Saturday, June 10, 2017

Yet again, a victory for the wacko voting system

Labour got 262 seats out of the 650 in Parliament, on the basis of 40% of votes cast nationally. 40% of 650 seats is 260, so the actual result is a fair approximation, this time.

But although the Conservatives polled 42.4%, which proportionally should have given them 276 seats, actually they got 318 = 42 bonus Members of Parliament! 

So now they're getting back into bed with Ulster Protestants to make a workable coalition. What effect that will have in Northern Irish politics, who knows.

The system doesn't even work within individual constituencies, as I discussed six years ago*. In the 2005 General Election, only 220 MPs out of 650 obtained a majority of votes cast by their constituents; in 2010, only 217.

I expect it will turn out to be a similar picture when the results of this fiasco become available.

No wonder the inhabitants of The Bubble hate plebiscites like the EU Referendum; they're so used to gaming the usual rotten setup.

http://theylaughedatnoah.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/voting-reform-av-first-past-post.html

2 comments:

  1. It would seem that world wide the system is gamed, the blocking of parties with a big vote by others who are the status quo and combine to keep out a "new kid on the block" as in France and Germany because "their" politics don't conform.
    With PR it is even worse as few ever have a percentage mandate from the voter, what to do I haven't a clue but the system is broken, when was the last PM anyone thought did a good job for the nation and not the party, long long time ago.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's much more pronounced in the US. Here in Ohio, the votes run about 53% GOP to 47% Democrat, yet the former get about a 70% share of all positions.

    ReplyDelete

Unfortunately, because of a plague of spam comments, you need to be a "registered user", otherwise your observations will be buried in a torrent of multilingual nonsense. Please do comment!

Say what you please, so long as it's phrased politely and is not libellous or legally proscribed. Fact, reason and wit are keenly welcomed.