Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Shares: why bother?

The Contrarian Investor raises an issue I've been pondering recently: in today's financial climate, are stocks and shares old hat? They're only a market in what companies are willing to let the public invest.

If I were a rich entrepreneur who'd been smart enough to get into cash a year or two ago, I'd be looking to take my company back into private ownership, or buy another for a suitcaseful. Who wants to be told what to do by shareholders with bees in their bonnets, institutional investors looking to maximise profits like, NOW, and other goons? It's like being in a three-legged race with the fat kid.

Venture capital - is that the place to be?

4 comments:

  1. Hi Sackerson!

    Great minds think alike!

    We have been re-evaluating our ideas of what it means to invest.

    It's a different game today.

    ReplyDelete
  2. VC's success rate is under 5%. Not sure the model has ever worked - but pays well to do a fun job not involving much actual work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CU, what a job ad you can write! And remember how the founder of IBM paid his secretary in shares, because he didn't have enough money for wages? I think her descendants are living well on them even now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes but it releases capital to be used elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Unfortunately, because of a plague of spam comments, you need to be a "registered user", otherwise your observations will be buried in a torrent of multilingual nonsense. Please do comment!

Say what you please, so long as it's phrased politely and is not libellous or legally proscribed. Fact, reason and wit are keenly welcomed.