What a shame you're anonymous. I hope you're not simply a "troll" working for Google; but you haven't answered the point in the article, about legal assumption (I would say, surreptitious theft, morally speaking) of copyright.
According to this : http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
the contact with google is for updating the phishing filter, which makes sense. So the only objection is the strange ULA. I'll wait until they rescind or alter it.
They have rescinded it now. I did read there was an unpatched malicious code exploitation but I'm sure they'll be on it soon enough.
I loaded it, played with it for five minutes then put it to one side as it hadn't imported all my Firefox shortcuts properly. I then installed it after I read about the ULA nonsense.
Unfortunately, because of a plague of spam comments, you need to be a "registered user", otherwise your observations will be buried in a torrent of multilingual nonsense. Please do comment!
Say what you please, so long as it's phrased politely and is not libellous or legally proscribed. Fact, reason and wit are keenly welcomed.
google is the best at what it does. chrome is excellent.
ReplyDeleteWhat a shame you're anonymous. I hope you're not simply a "troll" working for Google; but you haven't answered the point in the article, about legal assumption (I would say, surreptitious theft, morally speaking) of copyright.
ReplyDeleteAccording to this : http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
ReplyDeletethe contact with google is for updating the phishing filter, which makes sense. So the only objection is the strange ULA. I'll wait until they rescind or alter it.
They have rescinded it now. I did read there was an unpatched malicious code exploitation but I'm sure they'll be on it soon enough.
ReplyDeleteI loaded it, played with it for five minutes then put it to one side as it hadn't imported all my Firefox shortcuts properly. I then installed it after I read about the ULA nonsense.
Sorry, that should have read de-installed it!
ReplyDelete