Who voted for the slaughter to begin? Nobody. The electorate
comprised 5.2 million men (some 60% of all adult males, and no women at all), but
they were not consulted. Instead, the order was given by King George V at a
Privy Council meeting in Buckingham Palace attended by only two court officials
and Lord Beauchamp. As historian AJP Taylor explained https://global.oup.com/academic/product/english-history-1914-1945-9780192801401?cc=gb&lang=en&
, this reflected ‘a general view that war was an act of state, if not of
prerogative, with which ordinary citizens had little to do.’
By 1918, after nearly a million British servicemen had died (with
another c. two million permanently disabled) https://historicengland.org.uk/research/inclusive-heritage/disability-history/1914-1945/war/
, it was thought that the people might be entitled to more of a voice. The Home
Secretary introduced the Representation of the People Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_of_the_People_Act_1918#Background
saying that the war
‘has made it, I think, impossible
that ever again, at all events in the lifetime of the present generation, there
should be a revival of the old class feeling which was responsible for so much,
and, among other things, for the exclusion for a period, of so many of our
population from the class of electors.’
Nevertheless, while the Act extended the vote to all men only
some women qualified - about 40% of them. The rest had to wait until 1928 to be
included. Universal adult suffrage in Britain has yet to celebrate its
centenary.
Even modernised democracy didn’t stop the repeat use of the royal
war-making prerogative in 1939; and it remains to this day the constitutional
position for the United Kingdom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_parliamentary_approval_for_military_action
. While we complain about minor infringements of our personal freedom, the government
reserves the right to kill us (and the people of other nations) wholesale, so
long as some pretext can be found that circumvents Nuremberg principles. ‘Gandalf’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9569815/You-looked-like-Gandalf-Tony-Blair-admits-lockdown-mullet-mistake.html
bounced us into war with Iraq, and ‘Dodgy Dave’ https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/on-this-day-dennis-skinner-thrown-out-of-the-commons-after-calling-cameron-dodgy-dave-263883/
only desisted from bombing Syria because he chose to ‘respect’ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23892783
a Commons majority opposing it.
The US Constitution attempted to restrain the Executive with
a specification that it should be Congress that declares a war. Despite the
country being almost continuously involved in armed foreign conflicts since its
foundation, that declaration has been made only eleven times, the last in 1942 https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/War-Powers/
. The use of the notion of ‘authorisation’ has allowed this power, like so many
others, to drift towards the Chief Executive, and in any case the next Big One
may happen so suddenly that there will be no need for a call-up before a general
incineration begins.
The US President’s nuclear football is ever at hand; Britain
is now stocking up with more atomic weapons https://www.economist.com/britain/2021/03/18/britain-is-adding-nukes-for-the-first-time-since-the-cold-war
; the winds blow around the old granite cross. And we have the vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment